Re: [Amforth-devel] Interrupts in Forth

[pito <pi...@vo...>]

> Bad unless you have a way to keep a queue of
> interrupts pending, for example 
> (which would be another neat project).
yes, a queue e.g. 8 vectors deep, then you must not care on T - when
q. not empty then int. has been fired, and forth will process them
in an order.. mind latency of forth..
P.