Re: [Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p

[Matthias T. <mt...@we...>]

Pito,

> it is not stack address, but the 16557 does not fit somehow...p.

current implementation is like 

: .s 
  sp@ depth 1- 0 ?do
    dup i
    dup u.      ( gives the "index" )
    2* + dup u. ( prints the address )
    @ u.        ( prints the current content )
    cr
  loop
  drop
;

(just reverse-coded manually from dot-s.asm)

Matthias