Re: [Amforth-devel] Protected Amforth

[Andy K. <an...@ki...>]

Ok what would you rather name them ???
I am not too hung up on names.

I agree that the prpject needs to protect itself from fuss.


-- 
Like a rolling stone
----- Original message -----
> Hi Andy,
> 
> > Did someone get the 168 to actualy work or do I need to put some time
> > into this again ??
> 
> All systems mentioned in the core/devices directory should work
> without trouble.
> 
> > I will rename the forthduino asm file to be mega and add in definitions
> > for Duemilanove, Deicimilla and Sanguino. A bit like the Polin
> > boards/definitions. That should pretty much be the full set of major
> > Arduino boards then. I can't see the point of doing any more than
> > those.
> 
> I agree with you that the arduino boards are (now) much better suited as
> a starting point than the pollins. But the pollin's are cheaper (at least
> for me ;=) ). And they can be used for a any controller that is still
> available
> in the PDIP format (no SMD) That makes porting amforth much easier.
> 
> forthduino may serve as the toplevel name for various implementations
> since they are no longer real arduino's. But: IANAL I do not want to get
> any legal trouble
> 
> 
> 
> Matthias
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
> lucky parental unit.   See the prize list and enter to win: 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> _______________________________________________
> Amforth-devel mailing list
> Amf...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel