Re: [Amforth-devel] heap and allot question

[Bernard M. <bme...@gm...>]

>please note: heap is not a forth value, it gives only a eeprom
>cell address.

Hi Matthias,

Shouldn't heap return the address of the top of heap, you can't actually use
the 4 offset until you use e@ to get the address so it should be included in
the "heap" word. That would also make it ans compatible right?

I realize that if you change "heap" then some words that use heap will have
to be re-coded ..

Cheers,
Bernard

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Matthias Trute <mt...@we...> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bernard Mentink schrieb:
> >
> > If this is correct, then should the code line above be : >RAM  ( x --
> addr )
> >  HEAP e@ 1 CELLS ALLOT TUCK ! ;
>
> with  : tuck swap over ; you are right ;=)
>
> please note: heap is not a forth value, it gives only a eeprom
> cell address.
>
> Matthias
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFIiWLU9bEHdGEMFjMRAqSQAJ9epDtgzM6JaVoVhMLRBombtBpXgACfUxwW
> 8wVrcO0fOw15IOJ3sthiwJg=
> =EWlX
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Amforth-devel mailing list
> Amf...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel
>