Re: [Amforth-devel] words: tuck/under etc

[Kalus M. <mic...@on...>]

Hi Bernard.


Am 16.07.2008 um 23:32 schrieb Bernard Mentink:

> I implemented the "Elegant FSM" version of Julien's code Section  
> 3.3 i.e:
>
> The FSM is then defined as
>
> 4 WIDE FSM:
> \ input:  |  other?  |  num?   |  minus?  |   dp?     |
> \ state:  ---------------------------------------------
>    ( 0 )     DROP >0    EMIT >1   EMIT >1     EMIT >2
>    ( 1 )     DROP >1    EMIT >1   DROP >1     EMIT >2
>    ( 2 )     DROP >2    EMIT >2   DROP >2     DROP >2 ;
>
>
> That seems to me the most readable and flexible of all his examples.
> I have given Mathias the code for including in the Lib.

Well, so you finaly got used to the ]-trick of FSM:

I agree, this way to set up the array realy looks good.

Something like   ' drop , ' >0 ,  ..   is uglier.

:-)
Michael