Re: [Amforth-devel] u*/mod should multiply unsigned?

[Kalus M. <mic...@on...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi.


Am 16.07.2008 um 21:21 schrieb Matthias Trute:
>>  I think I've run
>> into a bug related to u*/mod.  It's listed as accepting unsigned
>> values, but (as of amforth v2.8) uses m* for multiplication.
>> Shouldn't it be using um*?
>
> The u*/mod currently passes the Hayes Test, but I'll check your fix
> ASAP, it is
> too obvious to be ignored ;=)

In dpans forth there is no "u*/mod"  at all;  even gforth has no such  
word.

I wonder how it sneeked into amforth?

Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFIflVVJ3DLQCvSXtcRAhvWAKD+CdNr0CQvh1F96xptWTr8feXWrACgovtb
fYscooOwVhN4suaBVf/lmog=
=3rze
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----