Re: [Amforth-devel] u*/mod should multiply unsigned?

[Matthias T. <mt...@we...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ho Alexander

Alexander Guy wrote:
> Greetings, First of all, thanks to all of the developers for making
> amforth available; I've found it extremely useful.

Thank you, and allow me a simple question: what do you do with amforth?
I get only very vage project descriptions, if anything at all; but am
very
interested what people do with amforth (you can answer me directly,
I won't disclose your ideas)...

>  I think I've run
> into a bug related to u*/mod.  It's listed as accepting unsigned
> values, but (as of amforth v2.8) uses m* for multiplication.
> Shouldn't it be using um*?

The u*/mod currently passes the Hayes Test, but I'll check your fix
ASAP, it is
too obvious to be ignored ;=)

Matthias

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIfkol9bEHdGEMFjMRApJKAJ9ITjFy1hbMEL6ddCr/4OSenMT9bgCfYZI/
MDtF1UfDM98AQmDpHH9eofc=
=7Jqh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----