From: Kalus M. <mic...@on...> - 2008-07-16 08:37:54
|
Hi Ulli. Am 16.07.2008 um 08:12 schrieb Ulrich Hoffmann: >> Is the solution now to use *: perform postpone @ postpone execute; >> *?? > yes Hm, what makes the differencce in using : perform postpone @ postpone execute ; ( A ) instead of : perform @ execute ; ( B ) then? Speed? Looks like Version A acts like an makro compiling @ and EXECUTE into your definition, so that at runtime there will be less overhead because we skip one NEXT level this way? If speed does not matter that much version B will do the same thing? Michael |