Menu
▾
▴
amforth-devel
|
From: Jan K. <kro...@ho...> - 2012-05-31 10:15:00
|
Hello, I tested the word vocabulary with vocabulary test-vocabulary only forth also test-vocabulary definitions: test1 ." test1" ; : test2 ." test2" ; : test3 ." test3" ; : test4 ." test4" ; : test5 ." test5" ;previous definitions On one thing all is working fine. When I wont to go back to the Forth vocabulary, in my win32 forth I type in FORTH.When I try that in amForth there is no posibilty to go back.System is not recognise anny words except the ones in the vocabulary. What should I do? Thanks for anny help.Cheers, Jan KromhoutHellevoetsluis-NL |
|
From: Erich W. <ew....@na...> - 2012-05-31 10:31:43
|
Hi Jan, On 05/31/2012 12:14 PM, Jan Kromhout wrote: > > Hello, I tested the word vocabulary with vocabulary test-vocabulary > only forth also test-vocabulary definitions: test1 ." test1" ; > : test2 ." test2" ; > : test3 ." test3" ; > : test4 ." test4" ; > : test5 ." test5" ;previous definitions On one thing all is working fine. When I wont > to go back to the Forth vocabulary, in my win32 forth I type in FORTH.When I try that > in amForth there is no posibilty to go back.System is not recognise anny words except > the ones in the vocabulary. What should I do? Thanks for anny help. > "FORTH" or "forth" ? Please note, that amforth is case-sensitive. Looking at http://amforth.sourceforge.net/words/index.html the word "forth" (lower case) is available. Cheers, Erich |
|
From: Jan K. <kro...@ho...> - 2012-05-31 16:01:56
|
Hi Erich This is the answer that I get from amForth amforth 4.8 ATmega328P > ok > ok > forth forth ?? -13 5 > FORTH FORTH ?? -13 5 > Sommeting wrong with the definition of vacabulary or the other words? Cheers, Jan> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 12:31:24 +0200 > From: ew....@na... > To: amf...@li... > Subject: Re: [Amforth] Vocabulary > > Hi Jan, > > On 05/31/2012 12:14 PM, Jan Kromhout wrote: > > > > Hello, I tested the word vocabulary with vocabulary test-vocabulary > > only forth also test-vocabulary definitions: test1 ." test1" ; > > : test2 ." test2" ; > > : test3 ." test3" ; > > : test4 ." test4" ; > > : test5 ." test5" ;previous definitions On one thing all is working fine. When I wont > > to go back to the Forth vocabulary, in my win32 forth I type in FORTH.When I try that > > in amForth there is no posibilty to go back.System is not recognise anny words except > > the ones in the vocabulary. What should I do? Thanks for anny help. > > > > "FORTH" or "forth" ? > > Please note, that amforth is case-sensitive. Looking at > http://amforth.sourceforge.net/words/index.html > the word "forth" (lower case) is available. > > > Cheers, > Erich > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/ > Amf...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel |
|
From: Erich W. <ew....@na...> - 2012-05-31 17:35:07
|
Hi Jan, On 05/31/2012 06:01 PM, Jan Kromhout wrote: > > Hi Erich This is the answer that I get from amForth amforth 4.8 ATmega328P >> > ok >> > ok >> forth > forth ?? -13 5 >> FORTH > FORTH ?? -13 5 If you get error -13, which is "word not found", then this word should not show up in the output of " words ". Did you check that? This means, your question is "how do I get the word forth into the installed amforth?". First: find, where "forth" is defined: cd /home/my/path/to/amforth grep -rl '"forth"' ./trunk ./trunk/doc/TechnicalGuide/.svn/text-base/amforth-architecture.xml.svn-base ./trunk/doc/TechnicalGuide/amforth-architecture.xml ./trunk/core/words/.svn/text-base/forth.asm.svn-base ./trunk/core/words/forth.asm Please note the single+double quotes. I want to find the string including its enclosing double quotes. Otherwise I will get too many matches. So it finds 4 files. 2 of them are items in the subversion version control infrastructure (*.svn-base), so I ignore those. The file ./trunk/core/words/forth.asm holds the definition of the word. cat ./trunk/core/words/forth.asm ; ( -- ) ; Search Order ; replace the search order list with the system default list VE_FORTH: .dw $ff05 .db "forth",0 <== this is the entry in the wordlist .dw VE_HEAD .set VE_HEAD = VE_FORTH XT_FORTH: .dw DO_COLON PFA_FORTH: .dw XT_GET_ORDER .dw XT_SWAP .dw XT_DROP .dw XT_FORTH_WORDLIST .dw XT_SWAP .dw XT_SET_ORDER .dw XT_EXIT We know now, in which file the definition resides. Second: we need to see, whether this file is included somewhere, or not. grep -rl 'include "words/forth.asm"' ./trunk ./trunk/core/dict_wl.inc ./trunk/core/.svn/text-base/dict_wl.inc.svn-base There is an include statement in dict_wl.inc. cat ./trunk/core/dict_wl.inc .include "words/set-current.asm" .include "words/previous.asm" .include "words/definitions.asm" .include "words/wordlist.asm" .include "words/only.asm" .include "words/forth.asm" .include "words/forth-wordlist.asm" .include "words/also.asm" .include "words/set-order.asm" .include "words/order.asm" So this is the file you want to add into your local dict_appl.inc Third: if forth.asm is not included in some "dict_*.inc" file, then you add this to your local dict_appl.inc file. .include "dict_wl.inc" Moral: amforth does not include more than it needs itself to function properly. This is a concious decision towards keeping the amforth system on the controller as small as possible. However, the programmer has full control to include whatever is missing for his/her particular piece of code. Hope this helps, Erich > Sommeting wrong with the definition of vacabulary or the other words? > Cheers, Jan> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 12:31:24 +0200 >> From: ew....@na... >> To: amf...@li... >> Subject: Re: [Amforth] Vocabulary >> >> Hi Jan, >> >> On 05/31/2012 12:14 PM, Jan Kromhout wrote: >>> >>> Hello, I tested the word vocabulary with vocabulary test-vocabulary >>> only forth also test-vocabulary definitions: test1 ." test1" ; >>> : test2 ." test2" ; >>> : test3 ." test3" ; >>> : test4 ." test4" ; >>> : test5 ." test5" ;previous definitions On one thing all is working fine. When I wont >>> to go back to the Forth vocabulary, in my win32 forth I type in FORTH.When I try that >>> in amForth there is no posibilty to go back.System is not recognise anny words except >>> the ones in the vocabulary. What should I do? Thanks for anny help. >> > >> >> "FORTH" or "forth" ? >> >> Please note, that amforth is case-sensitive. Looking at >> http://amforth.sourceforge.net/words/index.html >> the word "forth" (lower case) is available. >> >> >> Cheers, >> Erich >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/ >> Amf...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/ > Amf...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel |
|
From: Matthias T. <mt...@we...> - 2012-05-31 17:39:58
|
Hi Jan, > Hello, I tested the word vocabulary with vocabulary test-vocabulary I've reproduced your test and it works for me. I could not reproduce your results. The formatting is somewhat ugly, sorry for that .... >> vocabulary dummy > ok >> only > ok >> order > 20 > 1 20 ok >> forth > ok >> also order > 20 > 2 20 20 ok >> dummy definitions > ok >> order > 82 > 2 82 20 ok >> : test1 ." test 1 " ; > ok >> : test2 ." test 2 " ; > ok >> words > test2 test1 ok >> order > 82 > 2 82 20 ok >> previous > ok >> order > 82 > 1 20 ok >> definitions > ok >> order > 20 > 1 20 ok >> words > dummy vocabulary after elapsed ms expired? @tick ... >> also dummy > ok >> words > test2 test1 ok >> previous > ok >> words > dummy vocabulary after elapsed ms expired? ... >> order > 20 > 1 20 ok >> forth > ok >> order > 20 > 1 20 ok Matthias |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X