Menu

#89 ring split not working (No3)

Stereo SMIRKS
closed-fixed
None
5
2016-06-27
2016-03-24
No

Result is empty for both substrates.

String smirks = "[#6:3]-[#8:15]-[c;R:11]1[c:12](-[#8:2]([H]))[c:7](-[#8:1]([H]))[c;R:8]([#1,#6,#9,#17,#35,#53;A:4])[c;R:9](-[!#16:6])[c;R:10]1-[!#8!#16:5]>>[!#16:6]\\[#6:9](=[#6:10](/[!#8!#16:5])-[#6:11](-[#8:15])=O)-[#6:8]([#1,#6,#9,#17,#35,#53;A:4])-[#6:7](=[O:1])-[#6:12](-[#8-:2])=O.[#6:3]-[#8]";
String smi1 = "COC1=C2C=CC=CC2=CC(=C1O)O";
String smi2 = "C1=CC2=CC(=C(C3=C2C(=C1)CC(=O)O3)O)O";

Examples are also provided as short, self-contained Java Unit Test:
https://github.com/mguetlein/TestAmbitSmarts/blob/master/src/test/java/org/kramerlab/test/TestAmbit.java

Related

Bugs: #8

Discussion

  • Martin Gütlein

    Martin Gütlein - 2016-03-24

    envipath ids:
    rule3743
    u50144
    u137948

     
  • Nina Jeliazkova

    Nina Jeliazkova - 2016-03-24
    • assigned_to: Nikolay Kochev
    • Group: SMIRKS --> Stereo SMIRKS
     
  • Nikolay Kochev

    Nikolay Kochev - 2016-06-25

    The problem is due to the SMIRKS itself.
    The reaction is not applicable for this target substarte "COC1=C2C=CC=CC2=CC(=C1O)O" since it contains two fuzed aromatic rings, but the smirk defines two substritients to the atomatic ring with single not atomatic bond:

    (-[!#16:6])
    -[!#8!#16:5]

    According to the official SMARTS/SMIRKS syntax by default supported in Ambit,
    bond '-' means single NON AROMATIC and that is why these substituents does not match the aromatic substituent because the aromatic cycle is fuzed to another aromatic cycle

    Solution:
    Use insted of '-' bond deafult bond (e.g. nothing: CC instead of C-C) which means single or atomatic bond:
    ([!#16:6])
    [!#8!#16:5]

    One working version of the smirks:

    [#6:3]-[#8:15]-[c;R:11]1[c:12](-[#8:2]([H]))[c:7](-[#8:1]([H]))[c;R:8]([#1,#6,#9,#17,#35,#53;A:4])[c;R:9]([!#16:6])[c;R:10]1[!#8!#16:5]>>[!#16:6]\\[#6:9](=[#6:10](/[!#8!#16:5])-[#6:11](-[#8:15])=O)-[#6:8]([#1,#6,#9,#17,#35,#53;A:4])-[#6:7](=[O:1])-[#6:12](-[#8-:2])=O.[#6:3]-[#8]     
    
     

    Related

    Bugs: #8


    Last edit: Nikolay Kochev 2016-06-27
  • Nina Jeliazkova

    Nina Jeliazkova - 2016-06-27
    • status: open --> closed-fixed
     
  • Nina Jeliazkova

    Nina Jeliazkova - 2016-06-27

    Fixed in 3.0.3-SNAPSHOT latest revision 7696

     

Log in to post a comment.