From: Giampaolo T. <Giampaolo@Tomassoni.biz> - 2007-01-21 15:12:01
|
From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:sch...@se...] >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Giampaolo Tomassoni [mailto:Giampaolo@Tomassoni.biz]=20 > > Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 9:11 AM > > To: Michael Scheidell; Amavis-User > > Subject: RE: [AMaViS-user] Brand-new viruses, banned content=20 > > and spamassassin > >=20 > >=20 > > My matter, however, is not this. To allow people to get their=20 > > banned contents, my customers are banned_files_lovers by=20 > > default. However, by default they are not spam_lovers. > >=20 > > The problem is that, when a banned mail gets defanged and=20 > > forwarded to its recipient, it bypasses any spam check by=20 > > SpamAssassin, which is not what I would expect. I would=20 >=20 > What about banned quarantine to: some email address, it then passes = it > through clamav and SA, then to original recipients? I didn't try it, but I guess it doesn't: if you plan to use a mailbox to = quarantine messages, you probably want not to check them. Of course = these messages get some problems, since you are going to quarantine = them... Giampaolo |