Apache Allura / Chat

Apache Allura / Chat is hosted on FreeNode IRC channel #allura

Log for 2014-03-26

  • 14:39:13
    ASFBot

    Allura/600: #600 started building, estimated 22 minutes left. https://builds.apache.org/job/allura/600/

  • 14:39:13
    ASFBot

    dbrondsema: actually fix the flaky test

  • 14:48:23
    cory_fu

    fingers crossed

  • 14:54:06
    ASFBot

    Allura/600: #600 built successfully after 15 minutes https://builds.apache.org/job/allura/600/

  • 14:56:32
    brondsem

    yay

  • 14:56:52
    brondsem

    rat build failed though. I'll add the license header to scripts/ApacheAccessHandler.py

  • 15:05:53
    ASFBot

    Allura/601: #601 started building, estimated 22 minutes left. https://builds.apache.org/job/allura/601/

  • 15:06:55
    ASFBot

    Allura/601: #601 FAILED after 1 minute, blamelist: https://builds.apache.org/job/allura/601/

  • 15:08:14
    brondsem

    failure there is jenkins couldn't reach the git host. hopefully just transient :()

  • 15:13:47
    ASFBot

    Allura/603: #603 started building, estimated 5 minutes left. https://builds.apache.org/job/allura/603/

  • 15:14:51
    ASFBot

    Allura/603: #603 FAILED after 1 minute, blamelist: https://builds.apache.org/job/allura/603/

  • 15:15:23
    brondsem

    I disabled the build for now, since it apparently keeps retrying

  • 15:18:56
    cory_fu

    I don't understand why we're not getting any communication on the INFRA tickets

  • 15:20:18
    brondsem

    want to hop into #asfinfra and we can ask?

  • 15:20:55
    cory_fu

    I'm already on there. Apparently, infrabot comments in the channel whenever we update the ticket, which I didn't realize

  • 19:17:18
    ASFBot

    Allura/604: #604 started building, estimated 5 minutes left. https://builds.apache.org/job/allura/604/

  • 19:17:18
    ASFBot

    dave: [#6701] add license header - file was contributed in https://sourceforge.net/p/allura/tickets/6701/

  • 19:25:51
    rbowen

    Fascinating being in both #allura and #asfinfra ...

  • 19:27:43
    brondsem

    joes seems to be quite the character :)

  • 19:27:55
    brondsem

    I hope I can meet him and/or other infra folks at apachecon

  • 19:28:05
    rbowen

    Joe is indeed a character.

  • 19:28:28
    rbowen

    And you should indeed make time to meet him.

  • 19:29:10
    rbowen

    Having a sit-down with Joe, particularly over a meal or a scotch, makes an impression that he'll remember in future interactions.

  • 19:29:17
    brondsem

    yea, would be good to get infra aligned with allura as a potential tool for broad use

  • 19:29:52
    rbowen

    He's a good guy. He's brilliant and kind and diligent, but he can be a bit of a nutjob at times, too. ;-) You just have to catch him at the right time.

  • 19:30:00
    brondsem

    am considering hitting the mailing list on that topic soon actually, to get a basic understanding so I don't say something dumb in my talk

  • 19:37:00
    ASFBot

    Allura/604: #604 built successfully after 18 minutes https://builds.apache.org/job/allura/604/

  • 19:55:14
    brondsem

    cory_fu: a real live merge request on forge-allura :D https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/git/merge-requests/1/

  • 19:55:54
    Humbedooh

    rbowen: a bit?!! ;)

  • 19:56:14
    rbowen

    A bit.

  • 19:56:27
    rbowen

    As in "The Atlantic is a bit damp"

  • 19:56:28
    cory_fu

    :-) I'm working on [#7134] to get those URLs sorted

  • 19:56:33
    Humbedooh

    :)

  • 19:57:19
    brondsem

    cory_fu: right, I used the proper URLs since I knew them. looks like functionality is working well

  • 19:59:15
    cory_fu

    doc changes look good

  • 20:00:24
    cory_fu

    Something I noticed the other day about our merge requests view is that once the merge request is merged, you can no longer see what commits were in it.

  • 20:01:12
    brondsem

    hm. probably because it's a live view of commits. so after merge, there is no difference

  • 20:01:59
    cory_fu

    Yeah. I remember we changed it from being more static, but I wonder if some sort of middle ground would have been better. shrug

  • 20:45:40
    ASFBot

    Allura/605: #605 started building, estimated 11 minutes left. https://builds.apache.org/job/allura/605/

  • 20:45:40
    ASFBot

    dave: [#7287] Added docs for using ApacheAccessHandler.py for SCM auth

  • 20:45:41
    ASFBot

    dave: [#7287] add a few pointers and text tweaks; move ssh/ldap auth to its own page

  • 20:45:41
    ASFBot

    dbrondsema: [#7277] Remove "incubating" references

  • 20:45:41
    sfbot
  • 20:52:44
    ctsai-sf

    I’m looking over [#7051], or more accurately [forge:site-support:#6347]

  • 20:53:34
    ctsai-sf

    And, I’m wondering if/how they might be able to re-organize their tools with the paging.

  • 20:53:52
    ctsai-sf

    And, if I can say anything without breaking sfbot-000.

  • 20:54:15
    brondsem

    lol

  • 20:55:48
    ASFBot

    Allura/605: #605 built successfully after 10 minutes https://builds.apache.org/job/allura/605/

  • 20:56:25
    ctsai-sf

    They stated that one of their goals was to re-organize the repos so they’re fully alphabetical. Seems like that might not be possible if the desired destination is on a different page.

  • 20:57:34
    brondsem

    yeah, i'd guess not.

  • 20:57:48
    brondsem

    might be possible to move them forward a bit at a time but would be very annoying

  • 20:58:30
    ctsai-sf

    Well, since this is a corner case, perhaps the repos in question aren’t wildly out of order.

  • 20:58:54
    brondsem

    hopefully :)

  • 20:59:04
    brondsem

    they can adjust the page & limit params in the URL if it helps

  • 21:00:26
    ctsai-sf

    Ah, that should make it doable at least. Though probably still a bit messy.

  • 21:00:50
    ctsai-sf

    I’ll follow up with the user. Hopefully, this should cover it.

  • 21:01:04
    brondsem

    ok

  • 21:05:46
    cygwinports

    brondsem: I see you just closed #7051, does that mean the fix has been deployed to sf.net?

  • 21:05:59
    cygwinports

    (my project is the subject of the ticket)

  • 21:06:09
    ctsai-sf

    Ha! We were actually just talking about that.

  • 21:06:27
    ctsai-sf

    See the tail end of http://sf.net/p/allura/chat/

  • 21:06:41
    cygwinports

    ACTION looks...

  • 21:08:29
    brondsem

    yes it ahs

  • 21:08:30
    brondsem

    has*

  • 21:08:58
    cygwinports

    I thought so, but I"m still getting 500 pages :-(

  • 21:09:20
    cygwinports

    sporadically

  • 21:09:47
    cygwinports

    (of course, just as I wrote that, admin/tools actually loaded)

  • 21:10:15
    ctsai-sf

    Perhaps the default “limits” need to be lowered?

  • 21:10:57
    cygwinports

    ctsai-sf: re 20:53:52, apparently not :-)

  • 21:11:23
    ctsai-sf

    sigh

  • 21:12:46
    ctsai-sf

    Anyway, it’s time for me to take off. I’ve updated your support ticket with the follow-up I had written up before you joined.

  • 21:13:50
    cygwinports

    well, I was able to update my Donate tool, finally, but now I need to reorder the repos

  • 21:15:04
    cory_fu

    I'm a bit concerned that the Ming RelationProperty might be loading all of the entries even though we're not using them all, which is what's causing it to still be slow even though we added paging.

  • 21:15:52
    cygwinports

    _list/git just 500'd on me now :-(

  • 21:16:49
    cory_fu

    Yeah, it's definitely still a problem.

  • 21:18:57
    cygwinports

    am I really the only one with this many repos?

  • 21:19:39
    tvansteenburgh

    5,282? for sure.

  • 21:20:46
    cory_fu

    Yeah. Large numbers of repos on a single project doesn't seem to be a common use case, for sure.