Thread: [aKregator-devel] [Bug 101907] Read articles keep getting marked as unread after feed fetching (in s (Page 2)
Brought to you by:
lippel
From: Gary G. <ggo...@io...> - 2005-10-05 15:35:27
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From ggodfrey+kde io com 2005-10-05 17:35 ------- Created an attachment (id=12867) --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=12867&action=view) Patch to allow finer control over what constitues a "new" article. (one more time - hopefully it's right this time). |
From: Gary G. <ggo...@io...> - 2005-10-05 15:35:27
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From ggodfrey+kde io com 2005-10-05 17:35 ------- Created an attachment (id=12867) --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=12867&action=view) Patch to allow finer control over what constitues a "new" article. (one more time - hopefully it's right this time). ------- Additional Comments From ggodfrey+kde io com 2005-10-05 17:35 ------- Created an attachment (id=12868) --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=12868&action=view) Patch to allow finer control over what constitues a "new" article. (one more time - hopefully it's right this time). |
From: Frank O. <fra...@kd...> - 2005-10-08 11:33:51
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From frank.osterfeld kdemail net 2005-10-08 13:33 ------- Thanks for the patch, but we are in feature and string freeze for KDE 3.5 now, so we can't add anything to the GUI anymore. For KDE4 we can consider this, but I think we can boil it down to "Don't reset to new when article content changes" or something like that. I mean, what else than the description is subject to change? (well, titles, but only rarely). I refrain from exposing technical details like this to the user. |
From: <shs...@ya...> - 2005-10-24 06:56:50
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From shsschlarb-tux yahoo de 2005-10-24 08:56 ------- In my case all the articles and news (5 channels with about 77 items) are set to unread on startup of Akregator and it is impossible that the content changed, because there are some feeds that I wrote myself. |
From: Michael <mi...@sc...> - 2005-11-07 11:15:21
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 michael scribeofthenile com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael scribeofthenile com ------- Additional Comments From michael scribeofthenile com 2005-11-07 12:15 ------- Just adding a 'me too', Akregator 1.1.3 with KDE 3.4.3, under Gentoo. In http://www.php.net/news.rss and http://www.mozilla.org/news.rdf the same articles are marked unread after every fetch. |
From: Gunnar G. <gug...@te...> - 2006-01-19 17:51:27
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From gugrim.2 telia com 2006-01-19 18:51 ------- Just installed 3.5 and it still has the problem. After reading the comments above I get the impression that Frank is of the oppinion that this is not a bug and that a new feature, with UI changes, is required. I'm not sure I agree. If the publishing date hasn't changed then isn't that enough? I don't know if that is what Thunderbird uses but it somehow manages to get it right. Wouldn't it be possible to fix this, i e use the publishing date, and then perhaps in KDE4 add an option where you can specify for each feed that it should check other fields? Since the sourceforge file release feeds put download statistics in their descriptions this is really a problem. |
From: <ow...@bu...> - 2006-01-25 22:36:26
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 frank.osterfeld kdemail net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nescius cyber cz ------- Additional Comments From frank.osterfeld kdemail net 2006-01-25 23:36 ------- *** Bug 119712 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: Derek B. <au...@po...> - 2006-02-03 18:18:54
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From auspex pointerstop ca 2006-02-03 19:18 ------- I too see this problem, and it can't possibly 'boil ... down to "Don't reset to new when article content changes"'. I've just tried all the different archive settings, quit kontact, start kontact, fetch feeds for each setting, and every time all articles come up as "New". Not Unread, but New. The only difference with any of the archival settings is that there are only 61 articles if I expire anything older than 10 days and 115 with any other setting. KDE 3.5, akregator 1.2.1, kontact 1.2 |
From: Doug M. <dj...@ca...> - 2006-02-05 12:03:19
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From djm86 cam ac uk 2006-02-05 13:03 ------- I am adding a me too for this bug with Kubuntu and KDE 3.5, akregator 1.2.1, kontact 1.2. I thought I would just add some more feeds that display this problem for testing purposes (these are all the feeds I read unfortunately!) http://www.lifehacker.com/index.xml http://www.gizmodo.com/index.xml http://www.kde.org/dot/kde-apps-content.rdf This is my first Bugzilla post. Having looked at previous posts I assume this kind of post is allowed. If this kind of post is thought of as annoying/useless etc please let me know so I won't do it again! |
From: <sh...@ig...> - 2006-04-23 12:51:46
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 shlomif iglu org il changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shlomif iglu org il ------- Additional Comments From shlomif iglu org il 2006-04-23 14:51 ------- This happens to me with an item in the following feed: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/feed/8?format=rss2 This item is the "Advanced MySQL Replication Techniques". |
From: Caster <ca...@ma...> - 2006-04-25 09:12:25
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 caster matfyz cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |caster matfyz cz ------- Additional Comments From caster matfyz cz 2006-04-25 11:12 ------- Happens to me too, for example with feed http://gentoo-portage.com/RSS/Newest/ I've downloaded snapshot of the feed and uploaded it to http://www.kabel1.cz/~caster/Newest.xml (will also add it as attachment) The articles I see marked as New (red) after every feed fetch are: xft-7.0 asterisk-1.0.9-r4 baselayout-1.12.0_pre18-r1 vdr2jpeg-0.0.8b When I open the raw xml in Firefox, I can see two different articles (for example) for baselayout: <item> <title>baselayout-1.11.15-r1</title> <link>http://gentoo-portage.com/sys-apps/baselayout</link> <description>Filesystem baselayout and init scripts</description> <guid>http://gentoo-portage.com/sys-apps/baselayout</guid> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:26:37 +0000</pubDate> <source url="http://gentoo-portage.com/RSS/Newest/">Newest Ebuilds</source> </item> − <item> <title>baselayout-1.12.0_pre18-r1</title> <link>http://gentoo-portage.com/sys-apps/baselayout</link> <description>Filesystem baselayout and init scripts</description> <guid>http://gentoo-portage.com/sys-apps/baselayout</guid> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:26:38 +0000</pubDate> <source url="http://gentoo-portage.com/RSS/Newest/">Newest Ebuilds</source> </item> But Akregator shows only last one of the versions! Seems it has a problem distinguishing these articles as unique, but the titles are different! The same thing applies for other problematic articles - all have more than one version and Akregator shows only the last one. My version is 1.1.3, KDE 3.4.3, on Gentoo. |
From: Caster <ca...@ma...> - 2006-04-25 09:15:47
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From caster matfyz cz 2006-04-25 11:15 ------- Created an attachment (id=15768) --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=15768&action=view) Problematic feed example Snapshot of http://gentoo-portage.com/RSS/Newest/ |
From: Caster <ca...@ma...> - 2006-04-25 11:25:19
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From caster matfyz cz 2006-04-25 13:25 ------- After reading some other bugs here, I realized that Akregator uses <guid> to distinguish articles if the tag is present. I see the articles in my example have same guid, so it's probably valid to treat them as one, and the feed should be fixed. Same goes for link from comment 41 - there are two items with same guid but different title (one of them is a typo fix). But the behaviour of marking such article as new on fetch is still wrong, I think. |