Thread: [aKregator-devel] [Bug 101907] Read articles keep getting marked as unread after feed fetching
Brought to you by:
lippel
From: Gunnar G. <gug...@te...> - 2005-07-30 17:21:28
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From gugrim.2 telia com 2005-07-30 19:21 ------- I don't think it is simply a radio button confusion, I have selected "Disable archiving" to get ArchiveMode=limitArticleNumber (from .kde/share/config/akregatorrc). Still, some articles keep getting marked as unread. It is always the same articles, seemingly randomly selected. I'm using KDE 3.4.2 and akregator 1.0. |
From: Adrien B. <spa...@fr...> - 2005-07-31 08:12:34
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From spam.bucket free fr 2005-07-31 10:12 ------- Why don't you use the Akregator version that ships with KDE 3.4.2? At the very least, you should upgrade to Akregator 1.0.2, but even that version is older than the one in KDE 3.4.2. |
From: Gunnar G. <gug...@te...> - 2005-07-31 08:34:09
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From gugrim.2 telia com 2005-07-31 10:34 ------- I will try it and see if it helps. The reason I added the above comment is that the comments from Frank hinted that the bug was only related to the incorrect radio buttons. |
From: Gunnar G. <gug...@te...> - 2005-07-31 09:32:43
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From gugrim.2 telia com 2005-07-31 11:32 ------- OK, now I'm using 1.1.2. The archive settings panel is now fixed but the "unread" problem remains. |
From: Frank O. <fra...@kd...> - 2005-07-31 09:38:03
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From frank.osterfeld kdemail net 2005-07-31 11:38 ------- How often does this happen? All the time or only for specific feeds and/or a very few articles? Can you list feed URLs and post which articles update all the time (it would be enough to list 2-3 articles that change and some that don't)? |
From: Gunnar G. <gug...@te...> - 2005-07-31 09:52:52
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From gugrim.2 telia com 2005-07-31 11:52 ------- Sure. Here's one that contains only two articles: http://sourceforge.net/export/rss2_projfiles.php?group_id=136710 The article about v0.2 being released keeps changing to unread while the one about v0,1 remains read. The problem is not easily reproduced. It happens sometimes when I press the "Fetch All Feeds" button, sometimes when feeds are fetched in the background. Also, if I fetch feeds with the intention of verifying the bug, there is no problem. If I just work with other stuff though, after a while I get a number of unread articles. If I find a consistent way of causing the problem I'll post a new comment. |
From: Frank O. <fra...@kd...> - 2005-07-31 11:17:18
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From frank.osterfeld kdemail net 2005-07-31 13:17 ------- How often does it happen in total? For (nearly) every feed? For one feed out of 50? It's possible that the feed changes. |
From: Gunnar G. <gug...@te...> - 2005-07-31 12:31:16
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From gugrim.2 telia com 2005-07-31 14:31 ------- First, to answer your questions: How often does it happen in total? - Several times a day. For (nearly) every feed? - Yes. Second, and mor importantly: Since I upgraded it has only happened once, and that was right after I started the new version. I'm thinking (and hoping) that the following has happened: Just before I quit version 1.0, I marked all feeds as read. Then I started 1.1.2 and the same articles as always were marked as unread. Now, it is possible that just before I quit 1.0 it performed a fetch and marked the articles as unread. Then when I started 1.1.2, the articles were already marked as read, making it look like 1.1.2 had done it. Now a few hours has passed and no articles has been marked as unread. So hopefully the bug is actually fixed with 1.1.2. Of course if it happens again I'll post! |
From: Gunnar G. <gug...@te...> - 2005-07-31 14:57:55
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From gugrim.2 telia com 2005-07-31 16:57 ------- Sadly, it just happened again. I'll attach one of the files in .kde/share/apps/akregator/Archive. |
From: Gunnar G. <gug...@te...> - 2005-07-31 14:59:33
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From gugrim.2 telia com 2005-07-31 16:59 ------- Created an attachment (id=12015) --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=12015&action=view) Archive file for a feed |
From: Gunnar G. <gug...@te...> - 2005-08-09 18:42:06
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From gugrim.2 telia com 2005-08-09 20:41 ------- I have now added a couple of other feeds and it seems that only the feeds from sourceforge are affected by this problem. The exact same feeds in Thunderbird does not behave like this though so I don't think it is a sourceforge problem. |
From: Gunnar G. <gug...@te...> - 2005-09-22 07:51:53
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From gugrim.2 telia com 2005-09-22 09:51 ------- Why is this issue marked as resolved? I'm using akregator 1.1.2 and it is certainly not fixed in that version. Is there a newer version somewhere? |
From: Thiago M. <th...@kd...> - 2005-09-22 11:02:53
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From thiago kde org 2005-09-22 13:02 ------- Both the KDE 3.4.2 and 3.5 beta1 versions should have the fix. |
From: Gunnar G. <gug...@te...> - 2005-09-22 11:35:42
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From gugrim.2 telia com 2005-09-22 13:35 ------- I'm using KDE 3.4.2. I think perhaps there is some misunderstandig here. There used to be a bug in the setting dialog, with radio buttons in the wrong order, and that one has been fixed. This fix may affect some causes for the problem but not all. As I said in comment #17, the problem remains for SourceForge feeds. |
From: Frank O. <fra...@kd...> - 2005-09-22 15:52:15
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 frank.osterfeld kdemail net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From frank.osterfeld kdemail net 2005-09-22 17:52 ------- Could you provide some example feeds (URLs) where this happens for you? The more the better. |
From: Gunnar G. <gug...@te...> - 2005-09-22 17:04:47
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From gugrim.2 telia com 2005-09-22 19:04 ------- Already have. See comment #16. |
From: Frank O. <fra...@kd...> - 2005-09-22 17:11:41
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From frank.osterfeld kdemail net 2005-09-22 19:11 ------- That's an archive, not a feed URL :) (I probably could find the feed URL by browsing the linked pages, but well, you know, developers are lazy sometimes. And if you have more than one feed URL, this could help, too) So far I have tried the ksvn feed from comment #12. Any others? Or just sf feeds in general? |
From: Gunnar G. <gug...@te...> - 2005-09-22 17:33:54
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From gugrim.2 telia com 2005-09-22 19:33 ------- Sorry, should have said Comment #12. Here are a few more: http://sourceforge.net/export/rss2_projfiles.php?group_id=36382 http://sourceforge.net/export/rss2_projfiles.php?group_id=64348 Only SF feeds seem to cause this problem now that the dialog bug was fixed, but I'm not sure about that since I only subscribe to a few others. HTH |
From: Frank O. <fra...@kd...> - 2005-09-22 17:50:31
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From frank.osterfeld kdemail net 2005-09-22 19:50 ------- Thanks, I added the feeds to my list, let's see if I can reproduce it. Can you trigger the status change back to unread? I.e. does it happen if you fetch the feed manually in a short time (try a few times)? Or only "several times a day" as you wrote, but not always? It would be useful if you could do the following 1) mark feed as read 2) copy the archive to archive-1 3) wait until the items are reset to new/unread 4) mark feed as read 5) copy the archive to archive-2 6) post archive-1 and archive-2 here I discussed a similar problem with someone on IRC 1-2 months ago, it seems that the check for changes (hash function) does not work properly on some machines. IIRC he tried to use the archive on different machines and synced them using unison, so the hash calculation might have different results on different machines. That shouldn't matter in your case though... |
From: Frank O. <fra...@kd...> - 2005-09-22 18:00:35
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 frank.osterfeld kdemail net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Read articles keep getting |Read articles keep getting |marked as unread after feed |marked as unread after feed |fetching |fetching (in sourceforge | |feeds) ------- Additional Comments From frank.osterfeld kdemail net 2005-09-22 20:00 ------- Another question: Are all the newest n articles in the feed (i.e. the ones that are currently in RSS file) affected? Or only some random ones, without a certain pattern? |
From: Frank O. <fra...@kd...> - 2005-09-23 16:25:16
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From frank.osterfeld kdemail net 2005-09-23 18:25 ------- The sourceforge feeds contain download statistics. So every time someone downloads the file, the feed changes. I guess this is the reason for the behaviour. Could you check? |
From: Gunnar G. <gug...@te...> - 2005-09-24 07:44:47
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 gugrim.2 telia com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #12015|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From gugrim.2 telia com 2005-09-24 09:44 ------- Created an attachment (id=12684) --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=12684&action=view) Archive files for three feeds. The attached file contains archives for three feeds in three different states: State a - After marking the feeds as read. State b - After akregator has incorrectly flagged several items as unread. State c - After again marking the feeds as read. Diffing the files shows that the description for the items that are marked as unread is indeed changed, due to the download statistics. The publishing date, however, has not changed. I guess now it is pretty clear what the problem is. Is it really necessary to include the description in the hash? If it is for some feeds, could it perhaps be made optional for a feed so that you can switch it off for SF feeds and others that use the description in a similar way? |
From: Gary G. <ggo...@io...> - 2005-10-05 12:29:28
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From ggodfrey+kde io com 2005-10-05 14:29 ------- I've been seeing a similar problem more recently with slate (http://www.slate.com/rss). It looks like the description field has links to doubleclick and such that changes every time you fetch. This changes the hash value of the article. I've attached a patch which allows configuration of which fields to use in the feed for calculating the patch (note this is bypassed if the feed has the "hash" property). |
From: Gary G. <ggo...@io...> - 2005-10-05 14:20:46
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ------- Additional Comments From ggodfrey+kde io com 2005-10-05 16:20 ------- Created an attachment (id=12864) --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=12864&action=view) Patch to akgregator (relative to kde-3.4.2 release) which gives better control over article uniqueness. |
From: <ow...@bu...> - 2005-10-05 15:01:57
|
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101907 ggodfrey+kde io com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #12864|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From ggodfrey+kde io com 2005-10-05 17:01 ------- (From update of attachment 12864) Whoops - left a few files in the patch that I shouldn't have.... |