From: Haejoong L. <hae...@un...> - 2003-05-07 17:04:30
|
Hi Matthias, So you are looking for a function which returns a time-ordered anchor list? Then, you can use GetAnchorSetByOffset. By the way, I just found two problems with ...SetByOffset functions. (There are two ...SetByOffset functions: GetAnchorSetByOffset and GetAnnotationSetByOffset.) It would have been better if the name was ...ListByOffset. The real problem is that in C++ implementation they return set<...> instead of list<...>. This means what you get from these functions is actually a set of ids ordered by ids, not offsets! I've updated the CVS repository with the fixes; they return lists now. This change doesn't affects Python and Tcl interfaces. Thanks for making me realize those problems. Finally, the SWIG interface files are available from the CVS: $ cvs -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/agtk login [return at the login prompt] $ cvs -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/agtk co \ -r Toward-2_0 AGLIB/src/ag_wrapper Thanks, Haejoong Matthias Thomae wrote: > Hello AGTK developers, > > in the new version of AGLIB, GetAnchorSet returns an unordered set of > anchors, even if they are sortable through their offsets. > > Are there specific reasons preventing to return an ordered list? > > If not, I would appreciate if this could be changed, otherwise I would > need to do the sorting outside AGLIB which would require some coding > and runtime efforts. > > Regards. > Matthias > > P.S. I am trying to do the changes myself, but missing the SWIG > definition files... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara > The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions > www.enterpriselinuxforum.com > > _______________________________________________ > agtk-devel mailing list > agt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/agtk-devel > > |