RE: [CompStrm Wiki] transactions are roles
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
blaforge
From: Norm K. <nr...@cm...> - 2006-03-04 04:16:31
|
Bill, I have a recollection of earlier attempts to be recursively rolonic for transactions, maintaining journal units for transactions so they could be retrodicted. This is some amazing journey we're on partner. Keep up the great work. ;-norm -----Original Message----- From: com...@li... [mailto:com...@li...] On Behalf Of BiLaf Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 10:16 PM To: com...@li... Subject: [CompStrm Wiki] transactions are roles Norm, In AgileWiki3, transactions are just another kind of role. So we can do tagging, add lsecs and comments, etc. It occurs to me a transaction gets a descriptor unit, too. Gosh Norm, we're more rolonic than I ever thought we'd be. Note that a login failure becomes a non-performing journal entry. Notational transactions! Meanwhile, I've changed the various transaction attributes into classifier entries. And simplified the display logic. Bill ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Compstrm-wiki mailing list Com...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/compstrm-wiki |