[aem-devel] AEM work

[Fan, A. <ard...@in...>]

Hi Frederic

Could you please add me and Boris to the developer list? Thank you.
My sf account is ardelle_fan.
Boris's is boris_hu.
We will setup the environment and run the testsuite to have a taste =
first. :)

From cgl-discussion mailing list, there is several line in PoC Meeting =
Minutes 6/19/03 that:
"
......
Opens
-----
AEM to be submitted to lkml.
......
"
Have you seen that? Could I know your plan of AEM submission to lkml?

And I think we'd better settle down a TODO list for several monthes. So =
that we can read
the source with focus and plan our long term development tasks.
According to your mail, it seems that SMP stabilization is a feature we =
could focus on.

How do you estimate the gap between current 2.5 implementation and the =
standard of being accepted by lkml? I am considering that it is also a =
good point for us.

And when I read through the "OSDL CGL Requirements for Low-Level =
Asynchronous Events", there are a lot of Priority 2 features required.
According to that document, p2 is for CGL3.0. But on the base of a =
stable AEM on both UP and SMP, and also acceptable to lkml, could we =
choose some imortant features implemented in CGL2.0? One more question, =
is all P1 features implemented in current 2.5.60 patch?

Sorry for so many questions and thanks for your help!

		Ardelle Fan
		Software Engineer,  Intel Corporation
		ard...@in...

		These are my opinions and absolutely not official opinions of Intel =
Corp.