[Adobe-source-devel] version_0 string[16]_t future?

[Kai <ka...@Ra...>]

Hi,

knowing the problem of binary compatibility from=20
hard learned experience, I am very interested in=20
your version_0 approach.

And string16_t is one reason more to look at it,=20
because std::wstring is rather unusable due to=20
the different ideas of the size of wchar_t on=20
different platforms/compilers.

After a first glance at string[16]_t I have the=20
impression that the functionality is very basic.=20
Nothing against keeping these classes simply and=20
not copying the monolithic design of=20
std::basic_string, but shouldn't there be at=20
least a little bit more? Like concatenation, for=20
instance?

What are your plans regarding string[16]_t? Will=20
they stay as they are, which would make them in=20
my opinion more suited for interchange accross=20
module borders and less for use as internal=20
representation?

Kai


-- 
Kai Br=FCning

RagTime GmbH * http://www.ragtime.de

Neustra=DFe 69 * 40721 Hilden * Deutschland
Tel: [49](0)2103 9657-0 * Fax: [49](0)2103 9657-96

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hilden * Amtsgericht D=FCsseldorf HRB 45697
Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Helmut Tschemernjak