From: Foster T. B. <fbr...@ad...> - 2006-02-13 19:46:09
|
Yes, currently we're missing an API. One of the requirements for the string replacement code was to take the best possible source xstring based on the replacement tokens provided, which implied there was more than one source xstring -- currently all candidate strings are stored in a context, but this could be avoided in the case when you have one xstring and just want to flesh it out. I'll add it to the bugbase. Blessings, Foster On Feb 11, 2006, at 02:04p, Sean Parent wrote: > I suspect we're missing an API (I'd rather not have to go through a > context for replacement) - but I think you should be able to simply > create a local context as a workaround. I believe you also want to > be using the marker mechanism for the replacement (Foster?). -- Foster T. Brereton <}}}>< Romans 3:21-26 A d o b e S o f t w a r e T e c h n o l o g y L a b "What 99 percent of programmers need to know is not how to build components but how to use them." -- Alexander Stepanov |