From: David C. <unc...@un...> - 2006-01-24 18:50:47
|
On Jan 24, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Foster T. Brereton wrote: > In the current Mac and Win32 implementations we take advantage of C+ > + inheritance rules to do some of the work for us. In retrospect > we've found this to be a burdensome way to implement this code, and > would write it differently if given a second chance. I'm curious - why is that? How would you have done it differently? -- David Catmull unc...@un... http://www.uncommonplace.com/ |