Foster Brereton wrote:
> Yes, that does help... The script is not accounting for WinXP's
> wackiness, and is presuming the directory has been deleted when it
> says it needs to be. It will take some time to figure out a
> workaround. In the meantime, do the new build documentation steps
> help to resolve the issue for you?
>
> Parenthetically, please note that GIL was recently moved to being
> under the boost/ directory. The script's intent is to move it out of
> the way, move boost into place, and then move the GIL directory to
> its final resting place in the fleshed-out boost directory. The build
> documentation does not reflect that yet.
>
>
That makes sense and congrats to the GIL team for making it into Boost.
I actually had already gotten it working by just looking at what the batch
file was trying to do and doing it by hand through mostly windows gui
interfaces.
Thanks,
Michael Marcin
|
