The code at web.ornl.gov/~nutarojj/adevs/ is a stable snapshot of the
development code that is in the source forge repository. The snapshots
that get put onto source forge often lag the ones at
web.ornl.gov/~nutarojj/adevs/, mostly because I'll forget to put up
the second post to source forge. I'd recommend either using the code
from the web.ornl.gov site or the code at the head of the repository.
Curious if you could speak to bdevs which I also found on SourceForge from you. At this point, would you still recommend sticking with adevs for doing PDEVS simulations? Or is bdevs at a stable point?
Thank you and thank you for sharing adevs with the world.
Sincerely,
Michael
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
bdevs is intended to be a simpler, friendlier version of adevs. It is
stable enough to use (I'm using it in a project now) but doesn't yet
support continuous systems like adevs does. My plan is to continue
development of bdevs and maintain adevs as needed. If you decide to
use bdevs, I'd be curious to hear your thoughts on it.
Curious if you could speak to bdevs which I also found on SourceForge from you. At this point, would you still recommend sticking with adevs for doing PDEVS simulations? Or is bdevs at a stable point?
Thank you and thank you for sharing adevs with the world.
What is the difference with the ADEVS code on the site web.ornl.gov/~nutarojj/adevs/ ?
From there I downloaded adevs-3.3, which appears more recent than this repository.
The code at web.ornl.gov/~nutarojj/adevs/ is a stable snapshot of the
development code that is in the source forge repository. The snapshots
that get put onto source forge often lag the ones at
web.ornl.gov/~nutarojj/adevs/, mostly because I'll forget to put up
the second post to source forge. I'd recommend either using the code
from the web.ornl.gov site or the code at the head of the repository.
Jim
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 3:22 PM, bergtwvd
bergtwvd@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hi Jim,
Curious if you could speak to bdevs which I also found on SourceForge from you. At this point, would you still recommend sticking with adevs for doing PDEVS simulations? Or is bdevs at a stable point?
Thank you and thank you for sharing adevs with the world.
Sincerely,
Michael
Hi Michael,
bdevs is intended to be a simpler, friendlier version of adevs. It is
stable enough to use (I'm using it in a project now) but doesn't yet
support continuous systems like adevs does. My plan is to continue
development of bdevs and maintain adevs as needed. If you decide to
use bdevs, I'd be curious to hear your thoughts on it.
Thanks for your interest!
Jim
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 3:51 PM Michael O'Keefe
michaelokeefe@users.sourceforge.net wrote: