From: Larry F. <Lar...@lw...> - 2012-05-08 19:14:33
|
On 05/08/2012 02:01 PM, Oliver Winker wrote: > Hi Larry, > > OK, Thanks for the feedback and the patch. Will check in the coming days. > > Now this is anyway quite interesting ... actually I didn't yet try a lot > with an 802.11n AP. Shouldn't that work anyway (without falling back the > AP to g) ? > > If there is something in the driver, that we can do in order to operate > with an 802.11n AP, then we should of course do that. But right now I > actually don't know enough about it. Yes, it should work in fall-back mode. The drivers for all my other devices handle that OK. As I said earlier, I need to analyze the exchange between the AP and the acx111. If you get a chance to test the patch and verify that the driver works on i386 architecture, and with an acx100 after the patch is applied, then I will formally submit the patch with a proper signed-off-by line. I am getting ready to test the acx111 on a 32-bit kernel with the patch. I will also wait with the patch until Jim's refactoring is merged before I submit any more patches. Larry |