From: <cap...@ti...> - 2004-10-06 15:42:26
|
hi there! recently I nedded a stable distribution of linux so I decided for debian but trying to install the acx100 driver for the dwl650+ i get many errors= . have you got any idea on how to solve them? here they are reported: make -C src make[1]: Entering directory `/home/capacity/documents/acx100-0.2.0pre8_pl= us_fixe s_33/src' gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O -fno-strict-aliasing -fno= -common -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D4 -march=3Di586 = -DACX_DEBUG =3D1 -DACX_IO_WIDTH=3D32 -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DWLAN_HOSTIF=3DWLAN_PCI -= I/lib/modules /2.4.25-1-386/build/include -I../include -c -o acx100.o acx100.c In file included from /usr/include/asm/smp.h:18, from /usr/include/linux/smp.h:17, from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:23, from /usr/include/linux/module.h:10, from acx100.c:70: /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:6:25: mach_mpspec.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/include/asm/smp.h:18, from /usr/include/linux/smp.h:17, from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:23, from /usr/include/linux/module.h:10, from acx100.c:70: /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:8: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a fu nction) /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:9: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not in a fu nction) /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:10: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not= in a f unction) /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:12: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not= in a f unction) /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:19: error: `MAX_APICS' undeclared here (not in a funct ion) /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:20: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not= in a f unction) /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:20: error: conflicting types for `mp_bus_id_to_= type' /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:8: error: previous declaration of `mp_bus_id_to= _type' /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:22: error: `MAX_IRQ_SOURCES' undeclared here (n= ot in a function) /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:24: error: `MAX_MP_BUSSES' undeclared here (not= in a f unction) /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:24: error: conflicting types for `mp_bus_id_to_= pci_bus ' /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:12: error: previous declaration of `mp_bus_id_t= o_pci_b us' /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:54: error: `MAX_APICS' undeclared here (not in a funct ion) In file included from /usr/include/asm/smp.h:20, from /usr/include/linux/smp.h:17, from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:23, from /usr/include/linux/module.h:10, from acx100.c:70: /usr/include/asm/io_apic.h:120: error: `MAX_IRQ_SOURCES' undeclared here (not in a function) /usr/include/asm/io_apic.h:120: error: conflicting types for `mp_irqs' /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:22: error: previous declaration of `mp_irqs' In file included from /usr/include/linux/smp.h:17, from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:23, from /usr/include/linux/module.h:10, from acx100.c:70: /usr/include/asm/smp.h:73:26: mach_apicdef.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/include/linux/irq.h:20, from /usr/include/asm/hardirq.h:6, from /usr/include/linux/interrupt.h:11, from /usr/include/linux/netdevice.h:489, from /usr/include/linux/if_arp.h:26, from acx100.c:76: /usr/include/asm/irq.h:16:25: irq_vectors.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/include/asm/hardirq.h:6, from /usr/include/linux/interrupt.h:11, from /usr/include/linux/netdevice.h:489, from /usr/include/linux/if_arp.h:26, from acx100.c:76: /usr/include/linux/irq.h:70: error: `NR_IRQS' undeclared here (not in a function ) In file included from /usr/include/linux/irq.h:72, from /usr/include/asm/hardirq.h:6, from /usr/include/linux/interrupt.h:11, from /usr/include/linux/netdevice.h:489, from /usr/include/linux/if_arp.h:26, from acx100.c:76: /usr/include/asm/hw_irq.h:28: error: `NR_IRQS' undeclared here (not in a functio n) /usr/include/asm/hw_irq.h:31: error: `NR_IRQS' undeclared here (not in a functio n) acx100.c:80:28: net/iw_handler.h: No such file or directory In file included from acx100.c:102: ../include/acx100.h:1310: error: field `spy_data' has incomplete type make[1]: *** [acx100.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/capacity/documents/acx100-0.2.0pre8_plu= s_fixes _33/src' make: *** [driver] Error 2 Thank you in advance |
From: Andreas M. <an...@us...> - 2004-10-06 18:01:08
|
Hi, On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 05:41:12PM +0200, cap...@ti... wrote: > hi there! > recently I nedded a stable distribution of linux so I decided for debian > but trying to install the acx100 driver for the dwl650+ i get many errors. > have you got any idea on how to solve them? Oh no, not another terrible compile accident! > here they are reported: > > make -C src > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/capacity/documents/acx100-0.2.0pre8_plus_fixe > s_33/src' > gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common > -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=4 -march=i586 -DACX_DEBUG > =1 -DACX_IO_WIDTH=32 -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DWLAN_HOSTIF=WLAN_PCI -I/lib/modules > /2.4.25-1-386/build/include -I../include -c -o acx100.o acx100.c ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > In file included from /usr/include/asm/smp.h:18, > from /usr/include/linux/smp.h:17, > from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:23, > from /usr/include/linux/module.h:10, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > from acx100.c:70: > /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:6:25: mach_mpspec.h: No such file or directory That (src/acx100.c): #include <linux/module.h> is supposed to be the KERNEL header, NOT the pseudo kernel header /usr/include/linux/module.h used by the GLIBC build! I guess /lib/modules/2.4.25-1-386/build/include is bogus and thus it falls back to using glibc kernel headers, which is plain WRONG for a driver intended for the current kernel version. Solution: fix the broken /lib/modules/2.4.25-1-386/build symlink / make sure you have the header files of your *current* kernel available (see README). Does that help? Andreas Mohr P.S.: I'm a bit surprised that our Configure script didn't abort/pause in this case. Or did it? |
From: <cap...@ti...> - 2004-10-11 15:11:08
|
what do you mean exactly with with pseudo-kernel heades? I have the current kernel headers, how can I fix the broken /lib/modules/= 2.4.25-1-386/build symlink? >-- Messaggio originale -- >From: Andreas Mohr <an...@us...> >To: acx...@li... >Subject: Re: [Acx100-devel] installation problems >Reply-To: acx...@li... >Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 20:00:58 +0200 > > >Hi, > >On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 05:41:12PM +0200, cap...@ti... wrote: >> hi there! >> recently I nedded a stable distribution of linux so I decided for debi= an >> but trying to install the acx100 driver for the dwl650+ i get many err= ors. >> have you got any idea on how to solve them? >Oh no, not another terrible compile accident! > >> here they are reported: >> >> make -C src >> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/capacity/documents/acx100-0.2.0pre8= _plus_fixe >> s_33/src' >> gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common >> -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D4 -march=3Di5= 86 -DACX_DEBUG >> =3D1 -DACX_IO_WIDTH=3D32 -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DWLAN_HOSTIF=3DWLAN_PC= I -I/lib/modules >> /2.4.25-1-386/build/include -I../include -c -o acx100.o acx100.c > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >> In file included from /usr/include/asm/smp.h:18, >> from /usr/include/linux/smp.h:17, >> from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:23, >> from /usr/include/linux/module.h:10, > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >> from acx100.c:70: >> /usr/include/asm/mpspec.h:6:25: mach_mpspec.h: No such file or directo= ry > >That (src/acx100.c): >#include <linux/module.h> > >is supposed to be the KERNEL header, NOT the pseudo kernel header >/usr/include/linux/module.h used by the GLIBC build! > >I guess /lib/modules/2.4.25-1-386/build/include is bogus and thus it fal= ls >back >to using glibc kernel headers, which is plain WRONG for a driver intende= d >for the current kernel version. > >Solution: fix the broken /lib/modules/2.4.25-1-386/build symlink / make >sure you have the header files of your *current* kernel available >(see README). > >Does that help? > >Andreas Mohr > >P.S.: I'm a bit surprised that our Configure script didn't abort/pause >in this case. Or did it? > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal= >Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us >Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more >http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl >_______________________________________________ >Acx100-devel mailing list >Acx...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acx100-devel |
From: Andreas M. <an...@us...> - 2004-10-11 15:53:07
|
Hi, On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 05:10:04PM +0200, cap...@ti... wrote: > what do you mean exactly with with pseudo-kernel heades? > I have the current kernel headers, how can I fix the broken /lib/modules/2.4.25-1-386/build > symlink? /lib/modules/2.4.25-1-386/build should point at the kernel source you used for building that exact kernel (i.e. something like directory /usr/src/linux-2.4.25/) cd /lib/modules/2.4.25-1-386 mv build build.old ln -s /usr/src/linux-2.4.25 (IF that is exactly that original kernel tree) Does that help? Andreas Mohr |
From: <cap...@ti...> - 2004-10-11 16:21:35
|
at all, nothing changed. (I don't know if it's useful to know I'm using a debian distribution) >-- Messaggio originale -- >From: Andreas Mohr <an...@us...> >To: acx...@li... >Cc: cap...@ti... >Subject: Re: [Acx100-devel] installation problems >Reply-To: acx...@li... >Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:52:55 +0200 > > >Hi, > >On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 05:10:04PM +0200, cap...@ti... wrote: >> what do you mean exactly with with pseudo-kernel heades? >> I have the current kernel headers, how can I fix the broken /lib/modul= es/2.4.25-1-386/build >> symlink? > >/lib/modules/2.4.25-1-386/build >should point at the kernel source you used for building that exact kerne= l >(i.e. something like directory /usr/src/linux-2.4.25/) > >cd /lib/modules/2.4.25-1-386 >mv build build.old >ln -s /usr/src/linux-2.4.25 >(IF that is exactly that original kernel tree) > >Does that help? > >Andreas Mohr > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal= >Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us >Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more >http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl >_______________________________________________ >Acx100-devel mailing list >Acx...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acx100-devel |
From: Aurelien J. <aur...@au...> - 2004-10-07 08:53:10
|
cap...@ti... a écrit : > hi there! > recently I nedded a stable distribution of linux so I decided for debian Which distribution are you using? stable, testing or sid? I ask that, because I made a debian package of the acx100 driver (almost, ie I just have the README to write). You could build it using module-assitant or make-kpkg. If it could help you... I'll upload it to the Debian archive today or tomorrow, I'll send a mail on the list when it will be available. Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' au...@de... | aur...@au... `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net |
From: Andreas M. <an...@us...> - 2004-10-07 10:18:04
|
Hi, On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:52:00AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > cap...@ti... a =E9crit : > >hi there! > >recently I nedded a stable distribution of linux so I decided for debi= an > Which distribution are you using? stable, testing or sid? >=20 > I ask that, because I made a debian package of the acx100 driver > (almost, ie I just have the README to write). You could build it using > module-assitant or make-kpkg. If it could help you... Cool! I just hope you name that one README.Debian... (which you would do anyway= , I'm sure, since it's standard) > I'll upload it to the Debian archive today or tomorrow, I'll send a mai= l > on the list when it will be available. Thanks! Is there anything I should do to help packaging for my favourite distribu= tion since 1997? (yes, I've got a *working*, *updated* installation from that time, 7th harddisk generation now... 1, 1.2, 4.3, 13.6, 30, 80, 120GB ;-) Andreas Mohr |
From: Aurelien J. <aur...@au...> - 2004-10-07 22:20:04
|
Andreas Mohr a écrit : > Hi, Hello Andreas! > Cool! > I just hope you name that one README.Debian... (which you would do anyway, > I'm sure, since it's standard) Yes, that's that file I was speaking about. >>I'll upload it to the Debian archive today or tomorrow, I'll send a mail >>on the list when it will be available. I have just uploaded it to the archive, but it is not yet available (it has to be validated by the ftp-masters). Meanwhile, it is fetchable on http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/acx100 > Is there anything I should do to help packaging for my favourite distribution > since 1997? You could test it, and report me the bugs and what as to be improved. I am sure there is a ton of things not perfect in that package. > (yes, I've got a *working*, *updated* installation from that time, 7th > harddisk generation now... 1, 1.2, 4.3, 13.6, 30, 80, 120GB ;-) Ouah! I also have the same installation for a very long time, but it was destroyed when I decided to switch to reiserfs, which was at that time still not very stable... Cheers, Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' au...@de... | aur...@au... `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net |
From: <cap...@ti...> - 2004-10-11 15:46:58
|
HI! one more thing: in the how-to document, it's said I need to enable CONFIG= _NET_RADIO and CONFIG_NET_WIRELESS and to disable SMP. I rebuilt the kernel but it gives a lot of problems, above all the eth0 device is not detected. the question is: is it really necessary to make those chances? what happe= ns if I don't do it? thanks capacity |
From: Andreas M. <an...@us...> - 2004-10-11 16:15:03
|
Hi, On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 05:46:50PM +0200, cap...@ti... wrote: > HI! > one more thing: in the how-to document, it's said I need to enable CONFIG_NET_RADIO > and CONFIG_NET_WIRELESS and to disable SMP. I rebuilt the kernel but it > gives a lot of problems, above all the eth0 device is not detected. > the question is: is it really necessary to make those chances? what happens > if I don't do it? CONFIG_NET_RADIO and CONFIG_NET_WIRELESS are *always* needed, but CONFIG_SMP shouldn't matter any more. Which eth0 device is that? Standard network card? Or our card? Andreas Mohr |
From: <cap...@ti...> - 2004-10-22 15:41:29
|
Hi! I'm having problems with the installation of the acx100 package, it seems= that everything goes well but when I launch the start_net script, I get this message with the error in the end Module successfully inserted. Setting rate to 11M auto. Setting channel 6. Going to try to join or setup ESSID any. Setting mode to Auto. dhcpcd: MAC address =3D 00:0d:88:8a:91:35 /etc/dhcpc/dhcpcd.exe: line 49: .: filename argument required .: usage: . filename dhcpcd.exe: wrong interface name "" What should I do? thank you very much capacity |
From: <cap...@ti...> - 2004-10-25 16:19:19
|
Hi! I'm having a problem installating hostap because I'm using a dlink card dwl-650+ and it works with the acx100 driver. the problem is that I have to load the acx100 manually while the hostap requires some settings in /e= ct/network/interfaces. but if I load those modules manually this file is skipped! I also get an error if I try to put the wlan0 up: # ifup wlan0 insmod: /lib/modules/2.4.25/net/p80211.o: No such file or directory insmod: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.25/net/p80211.o failed insmod: /lib/modules/2.4.25/pcmcia/p80211.o: No such file or directory insmod: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.25/pcmcia/p80211.o failed insmod: insmod p80211 failed Failed to load p80211.o. run-parts: /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/linux-wlan-ng-pre-up exited with retu= rn code 1 I think there's a kind of conflict between the acx100 and the hostap driv= er.Does anybody know how can I separate this two modules or solve it somehow? thanks a lot |
From: <cap...@ti...> - 2004-10-25 16:33:13
|
in other words i'd like to load the acx module but without outting the wl= an0 up. I need to do this with ifup so that it loads the configurations of /e= tc/networks/interfaces >-- Messaggio originale -- >Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:19:10 +0200 >From: cap...@ti... >Subject: hostap vs acx100 >To: acx...@li... > > >Hi! >I'm having a problem installating hostap because I'm using a dlink card >dwl-650+ and it works with the acx100 driver. the problem is that I have= >to load the acx100 manually while the hostap requires some settings in /ect/network/interfaces. >but if I load those modules manually this file is skipped! >I also get an error if I try to put the wlan0 up: > ># ifup wlan0 >insmod: /lib/modules/2.4.25/net/p80211.o: No such file or directory >insmod: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.25/net/p80211.o failed >insmod: /lib/modules/2.4.25/pcmcia/p80211.o: No such file or directory >insmod: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.25/pcmcia/p80211.o failed >insmod: insmod p80211 failed >Failed to load p80211.o. >run-parts: /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/linux-wlan-ng-pre-up exited with ret= urn >code 1 > >I think there's a kind of conflict between the acx100 and the hostap dri= ver.Does >anybody know how can I separate this two modules or solve it somehow? >thanks a lot > |
From: <cap...@ti...> - 2004-10-27 14:02:39
|
Hi there! I'm studyng at the HostAP driver that request a Prism2 based chip card. I have the D-Link dwl650+ that somebody says it's based on a Prism2 chips= et,others say no. can you tell me if the dwl650+ is based on this Prism2 chipset? thanks Domenico |