Re: [ActiveLock-Users]Activelock 2
Brought to you by:
ialkan
From: Thanh H. T. <th...@sy...> - 2004-08-03 13:23:26
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dick wrote on 03/08/2004 7:50 AM: | Hi, Hi Dick, Good points raised. The issue of shared DLL had been brought up in the past but no simple (read: elegant) solution was found to-date. Yes, I guess the only thing to do for now is what you have aluded to. i.e. make it your own: - - reset binary compatibility - - change the ActiveLock2 namespace (vbp project name) and DLL file name to something else and recompile | Could the code for Activelock2 be added into my application so that | I don't even have to worry about compatibility with DLL's Yes, that's a little drastic and defeats the purpose of re-use in component based development, but you can even do that. To do it, you'dd simply pull into your project all the classes and mods from ActiveLock2.vbp | Would this also improve security at the same time? I don't think so, unless you make some tweaks to the way it had been implemented. | P.S. I secure my apps by using Activelock to generate user codes | and Armadillo for the time limit feature. Interesting. You'll find that ActiveLock 2 handles time limits very nicely, IMHO. :-) /Thanh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFBD5HJF8rE9X/XrZIRAsJLAJ4iBafgk38wAkzeWYEaXQQmK2jLYgCdFDvo BL5MSap3DH8DRpYbg1+cmVQ= =faGM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |