[ActiveLock-Users]RE: Activelock-users digest, Vol 1 #29 - 1 msg

[<NR...@LE...>]

Hi Thanh,

No problem for me.

Nick

-----Original Message-----
From: act...@li...
[mailto:act...@li...] 
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 5:01 AM
To: act...@li...
Subject: Activelock-users digest, Vol 1 #29 - 1 msg


Send Activelock-users mailing list submissions to
	act...@li...

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	act...@li...

You can reach the person managing the list at
	act...@li...

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Activelock-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Activelock-users digest, Vol 1 #28 - 1 msg (Jean-Marie Arsac)

--__--__--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:25:12 +0100
To: act...@li...
From: Jean-Marie Arsac <jm...@at...>
Subject: [ActiveLock-Users]Re: Activelock-users digest, Vol 1 #28 - 1 msg
Reply-To: act...@li...

Hi Thanh,

No matter removing ActiveLock_Register() from API

Regards

At 25/02/2004 05:01, you wrote:
>Send Activelock-users mailing list submissions to
>         act...@li...
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-users
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         act...@li...
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>         act...@li...
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific 
>than "Re: Contents of Activelock-users digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>    1. ActiveLock 2.0.5 and backward compatibility (Thanh Hai Tran)
>
>-- __--__--
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 04:48:15 -0500
>From: Thanh Hai Tran <th...@ya...>
>To:  Act...@ya...,
>  "act...@li..."
> <act...@li...>
>Subject: [ActiveLock-Users]ActiveLock 2.0.5 and backward compatibility
>Reply-To: act...@li...
>
>Quick show of hands
>How many of you are using ActiveLock 2.0.4 right now?
>I'm trying to muster together another release and the API could use 
>some more cleanup...thinking of getting rid of IActiveLock_Register() 
>altogether, and simply have ALUGEN create the .lic file directly. This 
>would save the user a manual step of "registering"; they'd just put the 
>.lic file in the working directory and they're good to go. But of 
>course,  removing IActiveLock_Register() will break binary 
>compatibility. So let me know if this will cause problems for you.  If 
>so,  then I won't delete, but will mark it as deprecated in the API 
>docs.
>
>/Thanh
>
>
>
>
>-- __--__--
>
>_______________________________________________
>Activelock-users mailing list Act...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-users
>
>
>End of Activelock-users Digest

Jean-Marie Arsac
AZIMUT
T 04 94 39 06 61
M 06 11 05 88 23




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Activelock-users mailing list Act...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-users


End of Activelock-users Digest