[ActiveLock-Users]Re: Activelock-users digest, Vol 1 #28 - 1 msg

[Jean-Marie A. <jm...@at...>]

Hi Thanh,

No matter removing ActiveLock_Register() from API

Regards

At 25/02/2004 05:01, you wrote:
>Send Activelock-users mailing list submissions to
>         act...@li...
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-users
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         act...@li...
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>         act...@li...
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Activelock-users digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>    1. ActiveLock 2.0.5 and backward compatibility (Thanh Hai Tran)
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 04:48:15 -0500
>From: Thanh Hai Tran <th...@ya...>
>To:  Act...@ya...,
>  "act...@li..." 
> <act...@li...>
>Subject: [ActiveLock-Users]ActiveLock 2.0.5 and backward compatibility
>Reply-To: act...@li...
>
>Quick show of hands
>How many of you are using ActiveLock 2.0.4 right now?
>I'm trying to muster together another release and the API could use some
>more cleanup...thinking of getting rid of IActiveLock_Register()
>altogether, and simply have ALUGEN create the .lic file directly. This
>would save the user a manual step of "registering"; they'd just put the
>.lic file in the working directory and they're good to go. But of
>course,  removing IActiveLock_Register() will break binary compatibility.
>So let me know if this will cause problems for you.  If so,  then I
>won't delete, but will mark it as deprecated in the API docs.
>
>/Thanh
>
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>_______________________________________________
>Activelock-users mailing list
>Act...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-users
>
>
>End of Activelock-users Digest

Jean-Marie Arsac
AZIMUT
T 04 94 39 06 61
M 06 11 05 88 23