Re: [ActiveLock-Development] [ activelock-Support Requests-1013061 ] Module Support
Brought to you by:
ialkan
Menu
▾
▴
Re: [ActiveLock-Development] [ activelock-Support Requests-1013061 ] Module Support
|
From: Thanh H. T. <th...@sy...> - 2004-12-19 10:08:03
|
> > >Isnt this just because the VCODE is the same? > Yep, sure is. Dan Keeley wrote on 17/12/2004 6:46 AM: >Isnt this just because the VCODE is the same? > >He probably didnt regenerate the vcode for the new application name? > >Or does the application name not get used here? > > > >>Support Requests item #1013061, was opened at 2004-08-20 18:41 >>Message generated for change (Comment added) made by th2tran >>You can respond by visiting: >>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 >> >>Category: None >>Group: Support Team >> >> >>>Status: Closed >>> >>> >>Resolution: Accepted >>Priority: 5 >>Submitted By: Andy Kirk (andykirk) >>Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) >>Summary: Module Support >> >>Initial Comment: >>I have used ActiveLock 1.8 in many projects for a while >>now, but have only just found about this new version 2. >> >>I have an application now, which is split into three >>modules. Each of these modules (in the same binary) >>need to be licenced seperately, so that the user can >>choose which of the modules they want to run. >> >>i.e, >>Licence 1: Module 1, Module 2 & Module 3 >>Licence 2: Module 1 only >>Licence 3: Module 2 only >>Licence 4: Module 2 and 3 >> >>I though that one way to do this would be to support >>three seperate active lock components, each with a >>different application name, and then build a screen to >>allow the user to liberate the modules they need. >> >>The problem with this is that when I attempted to >>generate the application codes for the three >>applications (ProTrack-SM, ProTrack-CM, ProTrack-AD) >>all of the codes generated for each application appeared >>to be the same. >> >>Please advise if the desired solution is possible using the >>ActiveLock product. >> >>Thanks >> >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >>>Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) >>> >>> >>Date: 2004-12-17 09:55 >> >>Message: >>Logged In: YES >>user_id=797792 >> >>Closed since there's no further followup questions by >>originator. >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) >>Date: 2004-08-20 19:04 >> >>Message: >>Logged In: YES >>user_id=797792 >> >>Hi Andy, >>You're on the right track. But what you need to do is: you >>need to generate a different Software Code for each of your >>modules. You can't use the same code for all 3 modules, >>otherwise the generated license will be identical. >> >>We will likely implement modular/feature based licensing in >>2.1. But for, your suggested approach is the way to go. >> >>/Thanh >> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> |
