[ActiveLock-Development] [ activelock-Support Requests-1013061 ] Module Support

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Support Requests item #1013061, was opened at 2004-08-20 18:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by th2tran
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007

Category: None
Group: Support Team
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andy Kirk (andykirk)
Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran)
Summary: Module Support

Initial Comment:
I have used ActiveLock 1.8 in many projects for a while 
now, but have only just found about this new version 2.

I have an application now, which is split into three 
modules.  Each of these modules (in the same binary) 
need to be licenced seperately, so that the user can 
choose which of the modules they want to run.

i.e, 
Licence 1: Module 1, Module 2 & Module 3
Licence 2: Module 1 only
Licence 3: Module 2 only
Licence 4: Module 2 and 3

I though that one way to do this would be to support 
three seperate active lock components, each with a 
different application name, and then build a screen to 
allow the user to liberate the modules they need.

The problem with this is that when I attempted to 
generate the application codes for the three 
applications (ProTrack-SM, ProTrack-CM, ProTrack-AD) 
all of the codes generated for each application appeared 
to be the same.

Please advise if the desired solution is possible using the 
ActiveLock product.

Thanks


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran)
Date: 2004-12-17 09:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=797792

Closed since there's no further followup questions by
originator.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran)
Date: 2004-08-20 19:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=797792

Hi Andy,
You're on the right track.  But what you need to do is: you
need to  generate a different Software Code for each of your
modules.  You can't use the same code for all 3 modules,
otherwise the generated license will be identical.

We will likely implement modular/feature based licensing in
2.1.  But for, your suggested approach is the way to go.

/Thanh

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007