Thread: [ActiveLock-Development] Fwd: Re: [ActiveLock] Tutorial version
Brought to you by:
ialkan
From: Thanh H. T. <th...@sy...> - 2004-05-21 18:14:31
|
> > >We will look into updating it for the >latest version soon. > Keeley, would you have time to update the tutorial? I think you already have the latest source. --Thanh -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [ActiveLock] Tutorial version Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 14:06:12 -0400 From: Thanh Hai Tran <th...@ya...> To: Act...@ya... References: <c8l...@eG...> No, it was created for 2.0.5. We will look into updating it for the latest version soon. I think somebody else also had trouble with earlier. Please search the group archive for it, it may be the same problem you have. --Thanh shilliard2 wrote on 21/05/2004 1:29 PM: > I have downloaded the VB6 TutorialApp dated 11/03. Is this the latest > version, as I have had some troubles with it? > > ActiveLock is v2.0.7 > > Help will be appreciated, Stan Hilliard > |
From: Dan K. <da...@da...> - 2004-05-22 07:30:31
|
Possibly - but i havent downloaded the latest stuff yet.. Also you did do a couple of tutorial edits i believe after me? Tiny ones? What are the changes? >> >> >>We will look into updating it for the >>latest version soon. >> > Keeley, would you have time to update the tutorial? I think you already > have the latest source. > > --Thanh > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [ActiveLock] Tutorial version > Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 14:06:12 -0400 > From: Thanh Hai Tran <th...@ya...> > To: Act...@ya... > References: <c8l...@eG...> > > > > No, it was created for 2.0.5. We will look into updating it for the > latest version soon. > I think somebody else also had trouble with earlier. Please search the > group archive for it, it may be the same problem you have. > > --Thanh > > shilliard2 wrote on 21/05/2004 1:29 PM: > >> I have downloaded the VB6 TutorialApp dated 11/03. Is this the latest >> version, as I have had some troubles with it? >> >> ActiveLock is v2.0.7 >> >> Help will be appreciated, Stan Hilliard >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Activelock-Development mailing list > Act...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-development |
From: Thanh H. T. <th...@sy...> - 2004-05-22 18:22:29
|
OK. I'll do it then, and will send you the latest. Can you take ownership of updating it from then on? Dan Keeley wrote on 22/05/2004 3:30 AM: >Possibly - but i havent downloaded the latest stuff yet.. Also you did do >a couple of tutorial edits i believe after me? Tiny ones? > >What are the changes? > > > >>>We will look into updating it for the >>>latest version soon. >>> >>> >>> >>Keeley, would you have time to update the tutorial? I think you already >>have the latest source. >> >>--Thanh >> >> >>-------- Original Message -------- >>Subject: Re: [ActiveLock] Tutorial version >>Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 14:06:12 -0400 >>From: Thanh Hai Tran <th...@ya...> >>To: Act...@ya... >>References: <c8l...@eG...> >> >> >> >>No, it was created for 2.0.5. We will look into updating it for the >>latest version soon. >>I think somebody else also had trouble with earlier. Please search the >>group archive for it, it may be the same problem you have. >> >>--Thanh >> >>shilliard2 wrote on 21/05/2004 1:29 PM: >> >> >> >>>I have downloaded the VB6 TutorialApp dated 11/03. Is this the latest >>>version, as I have had some troubles with it? >>> >>>ActiveLock is v2.0.7 >>> >>>Help will be appreciated, Stan Hilliard >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g >>Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. >> Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. >>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click >>_______________________________________________ >>Activelock-Development mailing list >>Act...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-development >> >> > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g >Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. >Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click >_______________________________________________ >Activelock-Development mailing list >Act...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-development > > > > |
From: Thanh H. T. <th...@sy...> - 2004-06-11 08:35:59
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mr. Crute: Please explain what you're doing with the web site. The links to the tutorial and API docs are no longer accessible and www.activelock.org seems to be no longer in existence. What the hell is going on? - --Thanh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFAyW7YF8rE9X/XrZIRAsFzAKC6mrhORZvW4Ek6XuIIqTwy7DPDiwCePXyL Gl6+JpY6Mum/ZVJBthUwBQY= =xzS3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Michael E. C. <mc...@so...> - 2004-06-11 14:38:30
|
Than I have made some changes namely updates to documentation and multilingual translation. All of that went as expected and the website was working. I just checked it out a minute ago and I am not sure what is going on. It is not a result of the changes that I have made and I am currently checking it out. I will keep you posted on what I find out. -Mike Thanh Hai Tran wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mr. Crute: > Please explain what you're doing with the web site. The links to the > tutorial and API docs are no longer accessible and www.activelock.org > seems to be no longer in existence. What the hell is going on? > > - --Thanh > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) > > iD8DBQFAyW7YF8rE9X/XrZIRAsFzAKC6mrhORZvW4Ek6XuIIqTwy7DPDiwCePXyL > Gl6+JpY6Mum/ZVJBthUwBQY= > =xzS3 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. > >> From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the > > one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and > evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 > _______________________________________________ > Activelock-Development mailing list > Act...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-development > > -- **************************************** Michael E. Crute Senior Applications Developer SoftGroup Development Corporation mc...@so... |
From: Michael E. C. <mc...@so...> - 2004-06-11 16:22:44
|
Thanh... We are back online. I appears that the domain name expired yesterday and the good registrar didn't alert me. Anyhow I purchased another year subscription and we are now back online. I will further assure you that ALL the documentation and the rest of the site for that matter are all there and fully functional. -Mike Thanh Hai Tran wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mr. Crute: > Please explain what you're doing with the web site. The links to the > tutorial and API docs are no longer accessible and www.activelock.org > seems to be no longer in existence. What the hell is going on? > > - --Thanh > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) > > iD8DBQFAyW7YF8rE9X/XrZIRAsFzAKC6mrhORZvW4Ek6XuIIqTwy7DPDiwCePXyL > Gl6+JpY6Mum/ZVJBthUwBQY= > =xzS3 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. > >> From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the > > one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and > evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 > _______________________________________________ > Activelock-Development mailing list > Act...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-development > > -- **************************************** Michael E. Crute Senior Applications Developer SoftGroup Development Corporation mc...@so... |
From: Thanh H. T. <th...@sy...> - 2004-06-11 16:31:08
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thank you, good sir! Didn't you had to pay for the domain out of your own pocket. We would have been fine with activelock.sourceforge.net. A separate domain wasn't all that necessary. - - Thanh Michael E. Crute wrote on 11/06/2004 10:43 AM: | Thanh... We are back online. I appears that the domain name expired | yesterday and the good registrar didn't alert me. Anyhow I purchased another year subscription and we are now back online. I will further assure you that ALL the documentation and the rest of the site for that matter are all there and fully functional. | | -Mike | | Thanh Hai Tran wrote: | | Mr. Crute: Please explain what you're doing with the web site. The | links to the tutorial and API docs are no longer accessible and | www.activelock.org seems to be no longer in existence. What the | hell is going on? | | --Thanh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFAyd5GF8rE9X/XrZIRAu68AKCq8I9GFppt2a42ZUb2DGs7kTB0OACgnVkm 4B9RZTGzRapfqVJEVPM6/AY= =ZAQS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Michael E. C. <mc...@so...> - 2004-06-11 18:58:10
|
Yeah I did but at 6 bucks a year it isnt all that bad... Call it a donation! -Mike Thanh Hai Tran wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Thank you, good sir! > Didn't you had to pay for the domain out of your own pocket. > We would have been fine with activelock.sourceforge.net. A separate > domain wasn't all that necessary. > > - - Thanh > > Michael E. Crute wrote on 11/06/2004 10:43 AM: > > | Thanh... We are back online. I appears that the domain name expired > | > yesterday and the good registrar didn't alert me. Anyhow I purchased > another year subscription and we are now back online. I will further > assure you that ALL the documentation and the rest of the site for > that matter are all there and fully functional. > | > | -Mike > | > | Thanh Hai Tran wrote: > | > > | Mr. Crute: Please explain what you're doing with the web site. The > | links to the tutorial and API docs are no longer accessible and > | www.activelock.org seems to be no longer in existence. What the > | hell is going on? > | > | --Thanh > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) > > iD8DBQFAyd5GF8rE9X/XrZIRAu68AKCq8I9GFppt2a42ZUb2DGs7kTB0OACgnVkm > 4B9RZTGzRapfqVJEVPM6/AY= > =ZAQS > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. > >> From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the > > one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and > evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 > _______________________________________________ > Activelock-Development mailing list > Act...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-development > > -- **************************************** Michael E. Crute Senior Applications Developer SoftGroup Development Corporation mc...@so... |
From: Thanh H. T. <th...@sy...> - 2004-06-13 19:00:13
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mike, This is in response to your queries... | How many active members do we |> have? We've got Pete--technical advisor, Mads--testing, Dan Keeley--docs/tutorials, Wade's all-the-time busy but is willing to get back into it, and the rest of the members I haven't heard from them lately so I don't know what their situation is. And then there's me. | What state is the project in? | Where do we stand on a full release? ~ We're in Beta 2. I have no urgent plan for us to go GA/Gold yet. It all depends on user feedbacks. Let it soak for a while and if there are no major issues reported, then we can upgrade the status to Production/Stable. | What can I do to help? For one, I need you to manage the forums. A couple of times I went in there and noticed that some members have been waiting for 15 days for membership validation. Can you see if IPB has a notification feature where either you or me will get an email whenever some body is asking to join? | Also insofar as the website is |> concerned if you post what you want done in the website tracker |> on SourceForge I will attend to it ASAP (I will be checking it at |> least once a day), there's no need for you to bother with that |> anymore Glad to hear that, but I need you to set the permissions properly whenever you make changes, so that if I need to "bother" again, I can. | Finally... |> documentation, what do you want? Pete and I had been discussing this recently. The tutorial covered alot of grounds but we still need a developer's guide to 1) show the developers how to make the most out of AL to secure their apps as best as they can, and 2) give them tips on what they need to do should they decide to modify the code to suit their own needs. | Are we looking at a manual, just |> API docs, online Wiki style docs? Online Wike docs are nice, but we'll need something that we can ship with the release, so that the poor souls who don't have dedicated Internet access can access it better. | I will get to work on that as soon |> as you let me know whats up Why don't you get a template started and send it to me for a look. (BTW, this is something you promised to do nearly a year ago) Once we're in agreement with the format, I'll send you the raw materials for content. - -Thanh Michael E. Crute wrote on 12/06/2004 11:01 AM: | BTW... Can you bring me up to speed? How many active members do we | have? What state is the project in? What can I do to help? Where do | we stand on a full release? Ect.... Also insofar as the website is | concerned if you post what you want done in the website tracker on | SourceForge I will attend to it ASAP (I will be checking it at | least once a day), there's no need for you to bother with that | anymore your doing enough just keeping the development running. | Finally... documentation, what do you want? Are we looking at a | manual, just API docs, online Wiki style docs? I will get to work | on that as soon as you let me know whats up. Thanks. | | -Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFAzKQ2F8rE9X/XrZIRApQMAJ4nVcK+aqyJR/dFJMOnnDchGaEaZgCeIUAH l8vFpmWr7P0XXjsT3+rFGtw= =6S8o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Michael E. C. <mc...@so...> - 2004-06-14 01:16:44
|
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body> <font color="#3333ff">Thanh...<br> <br> This seems like the most effective way to deal with this information...</font><br> <blockquote cite="mid...@sy..." type="cite">We've got Pete--technical advisor, Mads--testing, Dan <br> Keeley--docs/tutorials, Wade's all-the-time busy but is willing to get <br> back into it, and the rest of the members I haven't heard from them <br> lately so I don't know what their situation is. And then there's me. <br> </blockquote> <font color="#3333ff">Ok so same old same old with the addition of Pete who is technical adviser. What is that role in our project? Also are you the only programmer?</font><br> <blockquote cite="mid...@sy..." type="cite">~ We're in Beta 2. I have no urgent plan for us to go GA/Gold yet. It <br> all depends on user feedbacks. Let it soak for a while and if there <br> are no major issues reported, then we can upgrade the status to <br> Production/Stable. <br> </blockquote> <font color="#3333ff">So we are in feature freeze? Or are you guys still programming? Also we should do something about the open trouble tickets and bug reports if we are just "letting it soak".</font><br> <blockquote cite="mid...@sy..." type="cite">For one, I need you to manage the forums. A couple of times I went in <br> there and noticed that some members have been waiting for 15 days for <br> membership validation. Can you see if IPB has a notification feature <br> where either you or me will get an email whenever some body is asking <br> to join? <br> </blockquote> <font color="#3333ff">Ok I will make it a point to regularly monitor the forums and look into the notification feature (I seem to remember seeing one someplace).</font><br> <blockquote cite="mid...@sy..." type="cite">Glad to hear that, but I need you to set the permissions properly <br> whenever you make changes, so that if I need to "bother" again, I can. <br> </blockquote> <font color="#3333ff">The permissions are finally set properly. And if you ever DO have to bother make sure you chmod 776 everything you upload, I will reciprocate the favor. But for the most part everything for the site should come through me. The turnaround time for any website work is TOPS 24 hours. Also you can post web work in the website tracker on SourceForge.</font><br> <blockquote cite="mid...@sy..." type="cite">Pete and I had been discussing this recently.</blockquote> <font color="#3333ff">Could you please keep these discussions on the developers mailing list so the rest of us can be in the loop (or was this when I wasn't getting group emails?).</font><br> <blockquote cite="mid...@sy..." type="cite">Online Wike docs are nice, but we'll need something that we can ship <br> with the release, so that the poor souls who don't have dedicated <br> Internet access can access it better. <br> </blockquote> <font color="#3333ff">Well we can go wiki docs and export offline versions for shipping with the app. This will encourage the entire ActiveLock community to contribute to the documentation effort instead of just leaving it to a few developers. We will still need someone (probably me) to keep an eye on the wiki's just to make sure only "good stuff" is getting in the docs. Insofar as that is concerned I have Wiki software I just need to modify it to connect up to our forum login system and develop a custom process to export straight HTML docs of "shipping". I will start work on that as soon as I get the green light from you. Turnaround time on that looks like sometime under 2 weeks TOPS (could be 1 depends on how things go).</font><br> <blockquote cite="mid...@sy..." type="cite">Why don't you get a template started and send it to me for a look. <br> (BTW, this is something you promised to do nearly a year ago) <br> Once we're in agreement with the format, I'll send you the raw <br> materials for content. <br> </blockquote> <font color="#3333ff">Well I still AM working 2 jobs and also taking courses at the college this summer, so my time isn't endless. But I CAN dedicate somewhere between 5 and 10 hours a week to this project; that should at least be enough to get some serious work done on the things that need worked on. About the template... think about the Wiki idea, we can export the wiki docs to an HTML format and maybe even compile them into an HTML help file for sending with our final release. This will allow all the community to contribute AND eliminate duplicate work. If you still wanna go with a Word doc type thing let me know and I will begin working on that ASAP.</font><br> <br> -Mike<br> <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- **************************************** Michael E. Crute Senior Applications Developer SoftGroup Development Corporation <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mc...@so...">mc...@so...</a></pre> </body> </html> |
From: Thanh H. T. <th...@sy...> - 2004-06-14 06:10:00
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mike, | Ok so same old same old with the addition of Pete who is technical | adviser. What is that role in our project? Pete's role traditionaly had been, even before he agreed to join us formally, to find security weaknesses in the implementation and suggest improvements. For that reason, I've dubbed Pete our technical advisor. :-) | Also are you the only programmer? That would be an understatement of the day, but yes. | So we are in feature freeze? Yes, that's the general idea of going beta. I announced it a few months ago when we moved into beta 1. | Or are you guys still programming? Only to fix critical bugs. | Also we should do something about the open trouble tickets and bug | reports if we are just "letting it soak". They don't seem to be critical issues so I will look into them in due time. We just need to make sure we address them all before we go to 5 (production/stable). | Could you please keep these discussions on the developers mailing | list so the rest of us can be in the loop (or was this when I | wasn't getting group emails?). I exercise discretionary judgement when deciding what's appropriate for posting to the list and what should be kept in private conversations (case in point: this email thread). | Well we can go wiki docs and export offline versions for shipping | with the app. This will encourage the entire ActiveLock community | to contribute to the documentation effort instead of just leaving | it to a few developers. We will still need someone (probably me) to | keep an eye on the wiki's just to make sure only "good stuff" is | getting in the docs. Insofar as that is concerned I have Wiki | software I just need to modify it to connect up to our forum login | system and develop a custom process to export straight HTML docs of | "shipping". I will start work on that as soon as I get the green | light from you. Sounds great. Let's go with Wiki then. Go ahead and set it up and let me know when it's available for a peek. Out of curiosity, what's the name of the wiki software that you have in mind? Is it WikiPedia? Cheers, Thanh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFAzUEyF8rE9X/XrZIRAn3gAJ0XfbGaD8hqf/4O7tkdWBUbliA5bACdFWK+ fKEYoAjL65IUzLkIgr/U6Aw= =ok7V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Michael E. C. <mc...@so...> - 2004-06-15 12:57:19
|
I plan to use MetaWiki the software behind wikipedia. Out of the few I looked at it was the easiest to use and had the most features. Do you have any other suggestions? -Mike Thanh Hai Tran wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mike, > > | Ok so same old same old with the addition of Pete who is technical > | adviser. What is that role in our project? > > Pete's role traditionaly had been, even before he agreed to join us > formally, to find security weaknesses in the implementation and > suggest improvements. > For that reason, I've dubbed Pete our technical advisor. :-) > > | Also are you the only programmer? > > That would be an understatement of the day, but yes. > > | So we are in feature freeze? > > Yes, that's the general idea of going beta. I announced it a few > months ago when we moved into beta 1. > > | Or are you guys still programming? > > Only to fix critical bugs. > > | Also we should do something about the open trouble tickets and bug > | reports if we are just "letting it soak". > > > They don't seem to be critical issues so I will look into them in due > time. We just need to make sure we address them all before we go to 5 > (production/stable). > > | Could you please keep these discussions on the developers mailing > | list so the rest of us can be in the loop (or was this when I > | wasn't getting group emails?). > > I exercise discretionary judgement when deciding what's appropriate > for posting to the list and what should be kept in private > conversations (case in point: this email thread). > > | Well we can go wiki docs and export offline versions for shipping > | with the app. This will encourage the entire ActiveLock community > | to contribute to the documentation effort instead of just leaving > | it to a few developers. We will still need someone (probably me) to > | keep an eye on the wiki's just to make sure only "good stuff" is > | getting in the docs. Insofar as that is concerned I have Wiki > | software I just need to modify it to connect up to our forum login > | system and develop a custom process to export straight HTML docs of > | "shipping". I will start work on that as soon as I get the green > | light from you. > > Sounds great. Let's go with Wiki then. Go ahead and set it up and let > me know when it's available for a peek. Out of curiosity, what's the > name of the wiki software that you have in mind? Is it WikiPedia? > > Cheers, > Thanh > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) > > iD8DBQFAzUEyF8rE9X/XrZIRAn3gAJ0XfbGaD8hqf/4O7tkdWBUbliA5bACdFWK+ > fKEYoAjL65IUzLkIgr/U6Aw= > =ok7V > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. > >> From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the > > one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and > evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 > _______________________________________________ > Activelock-Development mailing list > Act...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-development > > |
From: Thanh H. T. <th...@sy...> - 2004-06-16 01:10:55
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nope. Michael E. Crute wrote on 15/06/2004 7:49 AM: | I plan to use MetaWiki the software behind wikipedia. Out of the | few I looked at it was the easiest to use and had the most features. Do you have any other suggestions? | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFAz54VF8rE9X/XrZIRArBqAKCJBmm06BMvaRT+hNxRIICz7tTmrgCgo2mZ Ax0ebK7lkhKa4lG4hnEZJjI= =lzzG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |