activelock-development Mailing List for ActiveLock (Page 2)
Brought to you by:
ialkan
Menu
▾
▴
activelock-development — ActiveLock Software Development Mailing List
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(52) |
Aug
(170) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(62) |
Nov
(46) |
Dec
(3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(17) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(31) |
Jul
(59) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(5) |
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(4) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-27 19:28:01
|
Bugs item #1017830, was opened at 2004-08-27 12:28 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526385&aid=1017830&group_id=70007 Category: Interface Error Group: Development Team Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: GetProductLicense Initial Comment: Suppose you want to display the licence type to the user. There is not a way to get the ProductLic. I noticed the degates for RegisteredUser, InstalledDate etc But what about just returning the Product Lic in a routine like simular to Aquire (SEE BELOW) Or is this a security hole? ThanX GDM ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Private Function IActiveLock_GetProductLicense() As ProductLicense 'Modified by GDM 8/27/2004 If mKeyStore Is Nothing Then Err.Raise ActiveLockErrCodeConstants.alerrKeyStoreInvalid, "IActiv eLock_Acquire", "Key Store Provider hasn't been initialized yet." End If Dim Lic As ProductLicense Set Lic = mKeyStore.Retrieve(mSoftwareName) If Lic Is Nothing Then Err.Raise ActiveLockErrCodeConstants.alerrNoLicense, "IActiveLock _Acquire", "No valid license" End If ' Validate license ValidateLic Lic IActiveLock_GetProductLicense = Lic End Function ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526385&aid=1017830&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-22 23:45:41
|
Task #103255 has been updated. Project: ActiveLock Subproject: ActiveLock Website Summary: Enable zip upload to Programming/ASP forum Complete: 100% Status: Closed Authority : th2tran Assigned to: mcrute Description: I'm trying to upload a 2K zip file to the above forum on our Invision message boards, but got the following error: The requested upload failed. This is either because it was not in the correct format, or the size was larger than that allowd. Please investigate and document the resolution, for future reference. Follow-Ups: ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-08-22 18:45 By: mcrute Comment: Completed - CHMODed the uploads folder 777 and successfully uploaded a 100K file. Check the 'Developer' forum and see! Also tested upload in the ASP forum under an unprivlidged user account with success. -Mike ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-08-22 00:33 By: th2tran Comment: Status update please. Where are we at with this problem? ------------------------------------------------------- For more info, visit: http://sourceforge.net/pm/task.php?func=detailtask&project_task_id=103255&group_id=70007&group_project_id=30873 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-22 23:45:26
|
Task #103255 has been updated. Project: ActiveLock Subproject: ActiveLock Website Summary: Enable zip upload to Programming/ASP forum Complete: 100% Status: Open Authority : th2tran Assigned to: mcrute Description: I'm trying to upload a 2K zip file to the above forum on our Invision message boards, but got the following error: The requested upload failed. This is either because it was not in the correct format, or the size was larger than that allowd. Please investigate and document the resolution, for future reference. Follow-Ups: ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-08-22 18:45 By: mcrute Comment: Completed - CHMODed the uploads folder 777 and successfully uploaded a 100K file. Check the 'Developer' forum and see! Also tested upload in the ASP forum under an unprivlidged user account with success. -Mike ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-08-22 00:33 By: th2tran Comment: Status update please. Where are we at with this problem? ------------------------------------------------------- For more info, visit: http://sourceforge.net/pm/task.php?func=detailtask&project_task_id=103255&group_id=70007&group_project_id=30873 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-22 05:33:41
|
Task #103255 has been updated. Project: ActiveLock Subproject: ActiveLock Website Summary: Enable zip upload to Programming/ASP forum Complete: 5% Status: Open Authority : th2tran Assigned to: mcrute Description: I'm trying to upload a 2K zip file to the above forum on our Invision message boards, but got the following error: The requested upload failed. This is either because it was not in the correct format, or the size was larger than that allowd. Please investigate and document the resolution, for future reference. Follow-Ups: ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-08-22 05:33 By: th2tran Comment: Status update please. Where are we at with this problem? ------------------------------------------------------- For more info, visit: http://sourceforge.net/pm/task.php?func=detailtask&project_task_id=103255&group_id=70007&group_project_id=30873 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-20 19:06:57
|
Support Requests item #1004602, was opened at 2004-08-06 13:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by th2tran You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1004602&group_id=70007 Category: None Group: Support Team >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ravi (rvbhatia1) Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Summary: ActiveLock with vb.net Initial Comment: Hi, Ravi here, how to use Activelock with vb.net, any sample implementations ? Thanks in advance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2004-08-20 19:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 No further followup from the original submitter so I'm closing this one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2004-08-06 13:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 Have the look at the tutorial which is included in the latest release (2.0.11). You can also find an online version of it here: http://www.activelock.org/documents/tutorials/BasicTutorial.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1004602&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-20 19:05:04
|
Support Requests item #1013061, was opened at 2004-08-20 18:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by th2tran You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 Category: None Group: Support Team Status: Open >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andy Kirk (andykirk) >Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Summary: Module Support Initial Comment: I have used ActiveLock 1.8 in many projects for a while now, but have only just found about this new version 2. I have an application now, which is split into three modules. Each of these modules (in the same binary) need to be licenced seperately, so that the user can choose which of the modules they want to run. i.e, Licence 1: Module 1, Module 2 & Module 3 Licence 2: Module 1 only Licence 3: Module 2 only Licence 4: Module 2 and 3 I though that one way to do this would be to support three seperate active lock components, each with a different application name, and then build a screen to allow the user to liberate the modules they need. The problem with this is that when I attempted to generate the application codes for the three applications (ProTrack-SM, ProTrack-CM, ProTrack-AD) all of the codes generated for each application appeared to be the same. Please advise if the desired solution is possible using the ActiveLock product. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2004-08-20 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 Hi Andy, You're on the right track. But what you need to do is: you need to generate a different Software Code for each of your modules. You can't use the same code for all 3 modules, otherwise the generated license will be identical. We will likely implement modular/feature based licensing in 2.1. But for, your suggested approach is the way to go. /Thanh ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-20 18:41:54
|
Support Requests item #1013061, was opened at 2004-08-20 18:41 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 Category: None Group: Support Team Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andy Kirk (andykirk) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Module Support Initial Comment: I have used ActiveLock 1.8 in many projects for a while now, but have only just found about this new version 2. I have an application now, which is split into three modules. Each of these modules (in the same binary) need to be licenced seperately, so that the user can choose which of the modules they want to run. i.e, Licence 1: Module 1, Module 2 & Module 3 Licence 2: Module 1 only Licence 3: Module 2 only Licence 4: Module 2 and 3 I though that one way to do this would be to support three seperate active lock components, each with a different application name, and then build a screen to allow the user to liberate the modules they need. The problem with this is that when I attempted to generate the application codes for the three applications (ProTrack-SM, ProTrack-CM, ProTrack-AD) all of the codes generated for each application appeared to be the same. Please advise if the desired solution is possible using the ActiveLock product. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1013061&group_id=70007 |
|
From: Will L. <wil...@gm...> - 2004-08-19 16:55:57
|
Thanh, OK. That's a real problem for time-based licensing. You cannot sell time without allowing a user to switch machines within the time. I have enough users to know this is true. Users who buy a 2 year license will inevitably claim machine crash and ask to switch machines in the middle, if I cannot disable the software on the original machine, then I will have to give him license 2 or 3 times. So in short, a real Release method is definitely needed. Meanwhile, maybe we can have some workaround before the feature is in place. So, what does the Release method do? If I use Registry instead of lic file, when Release is called, does it erase the things in registry? Or, when I uninstall, does the stuff in registry get erased? Using registry to store the lic key won't stop hackers who can copy registry, but for most regular users, they won't be able to do that, this will get 99% of the problem solved. but regards, Will On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 01:38:22 -0400, Thanh Hai Tran <th...@ya...> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hey Will, > CC'ing the development list. > Yeah, we do have a sort of dilemma with license transfer, don't we? > Release() doesn't work like you think. It was intended to be used in > conjunction with Acquire(). Right now it's just a stub, but it's use > will be more apparent when we implement concurrent/multi-user licensing > enforcement. > > | In short, the question is, given a lic file is > |> already generated, how do i destroy a license on a machine? > > I can't think of how we can do it with the current version. We'd have to > build some new features into AL, like introducing a new property to the > license file called "Valid" or something, and provide an API for you to > turn it on/off. What do you think? Let's brainstorm.... > Also, this won't stop them from using the original liberation file to > register the second time. So we'll probably have to include some sort of > expiration period into the liberation key. i.e. you must register that > key within, say, 7 days from the issue date, otherwise it will become > useless. > > /Thanh > > Will Lin wrote on 16/08/2004 11:19 PM: > > | > | 2. A question. As you know, I want to sell time-based license. I want > | to allow a user to deactivate a license on 1 machine, and go to > | another machine, to use whatever time is left in his license. This is > | like a transfer of license from 1 machine to another. I have a web > | backend for this to ensure no cheating. But I need a way to destroy > | the AL license on the original machine - deleting the lic file is not > | enough, as a user can make a copy of the lic file. I looked at the > | method 'Release', but it does not do what I need. Am I missing > | something here? I tried making copy of the lic file, AL does not seem > | to be able to detect. In short, the question is, given a lic file is > | already generated, how do i destroy a license on a machine? > | > | Regards, > | Will > | > | > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) > > iD8DBQFBJDzOEA/jxGpGbpURAsh1AJ0S252merbho4tZizNkIYN0fl0d9ACfQDsG > ZJbT+QA4VK2eGhmzOKVUxNY= > =Ag3L > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > |
|
From: Thanh H. T. <th...@ya...> - 2004-08-19 05:38:30
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey Will, CC'ing the development list. Yeah, we do have a sort of dilemma with license transfer, don't we? Release() doesn't work like you think. It was intended to be used in conjunction with Acquire(). Right now it's just a stub, but it's use will be more apparent when we implement concurrent/multi-user licensing enforcement. | In short, the question is, given a lic file is |> already generated, how do i destroy a license on a machine? I can't think of how we can do it with the current version. We'd have to build some new features into AL, like introducing a new property to the license file called "Valid" or something, and provide an API for you to turn it on/off. What do you think? Let's brainstorm.... Also, this won't stop them from using the original liberation file to register the second time. So we'll probably have to include some sort of expiration period into the liberation key. i.e. you must register that key within, say, 7 days from the issue date, otherwise it will become useless. /Thanh Will Lin wrote on 16/08/2004 11:19 PM: | | 2. A question. As you know, I want to sell time-based license. I want | to allow a user to deactivate a license on 1 machine, and go to | another machine, to use whatever time is left in his license. This is | like a transfer of license from 1 machine to another. I have a web | backend for this to ensure no cheating. But I need a way to destroy | the AL license on the original machine - deleting the lic file is not | enough, as a user can make a copy of the lic file. I looked at the | method 'Release', but it does not do what I need. Am I missing | something here? I tried making copy of the lic file, AL does not seem | to be able to detect. In short, the question is, given a lic file is | already generated, how do i destroy a license on a machine? | | Regards, | Will | | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFBJDzOEA/jxGpGbpURAsh1AJ0S252merbho4tZizNkIYN0fl0d9ACfQDsG ZJbT+QA4VK2eGhmzOKVUxNY= =Ag3L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-14 22:33:02
|
Task #103255 has been updated. Project: ActiveLock Subproject: ActiveLock Website Summary: Enable zip upload to Programming/ASP forum Complete: 5% Status: Open Authority : th2tran Assigned to: mcrute Description: I'm trying to upload a 2K zip file to the above forum on our Invision message boards, but got the following error: The requested upload failed. This is either because it was not in the correct format, or the size was larger than that allowd. Please investigate and document the resolution, for future reference. ------------------------------------------------------- For more info, visit: http://sourceforge.net/pm/task.php?func=detailtask&project_task_id=103255&group_id=70007&group_project_id=30873 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-14 17:19:05
|
Task #103255 has been updated. Project: ActiveLock Subproject: ActiveLock Website Summary: Enable zip upload to Programming/ASP forum Complete: 0% Status: Open Authority : th2tran Assigned to: mcrute Description: I'm trying to upload a 2K zip file to the above forum on our Invision message boards, but got the following error: The requested upload failed. This is either because it was not in the correct format, or the size was larger than that allowd. Please investigate and document the resolution, for future reference. ------------------------------------------------------- For more info, visit: http://sourceforge.net/pm/task.php?func=detailtask&project_task_id=103255&group_id=70007&group_project_id=30873 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-08 10:24:41
|
Task #85537 has been updated. Project: ActiveLock Subproject: ActiveLock 2.0 General Summary: Fix bug 526385 Complete: 100% Status: Closed Authority : th2tran Assigned to: th2tran Description: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=786272&group_id=70007&atid=526385 Follow-Ups: ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-08-08 10:24 By: th2tran Comment: Closed ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-07-11 22:05 By: th2tran Comment: Done. Will be in Beta 3 ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-07-11 17:25 By: th2tran Comment: Started looking into this. ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2003-11-30 05:38 By: th2tran Comment: Moving to 2.0 general. Wasn't done for alpha 2. ------------------------------------------------------- For more info, visit: http://sourceforge.net/pm/task.php?func=detailtask&project_task_id=85537&group_id=70007&group_project_id=29689 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-08 10:23:59
|
Task #101434 has been updated. Project: ActiveLock Subproject: ActiveLock 2.0 General Summary: alsRegistry in 2.0 Complete: 100% Status: Closed Authority : th2tran Assigned to: th2tran Description: KeyStoreType = alsRegistry should raise a NotImplemented error in 2.0 since we haven't implemented it. Follow-Ups: ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-08-08 10:23 By: th2tran Comment: Closed ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-07-11 22:04 By: th2tran Comment: Done. Will be in Beta 3. ------------------------------------------------------- For more info, visit: http://sourceforge.net/pm/task.php?func=detailtask&project_task_id=101434&group_id=70007&group_project_id=29689 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-08 10:23:36
|
Task #100754 has been updated. Project: ActiveLock Subproject: ActiveLock 2.0 General Summary: Create command-line (GUI-less) version of alugen.exe Complete: 100% Status: Closed Authority : th2tran Assigned to: th2tran Description: Requested by our users.... Create a console executable version of alugen.exe so that the key generator functionality can be invoked via a command-line interface. Command-line argument syntax to be determined later. Follow-Ups: ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-08-08 10:23 By: th2tran Comment: Closed ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-07-11 22:06 By: th2tran Comment: Will be in Beta 3. Yikes! Feature creep. ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-07-02 06:41 By: th2tran Comment: Generally complete, but could use more error handling. Will be in beta 3. ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-06-28 03:48 By: th2tran Comment: Began work on this. Will be called alugenc.exe ------------------------------------------------------- For more info, visit: http://sourceforge.net/pm/task.php?func=detailtask&project_task_id=100754&group_id=70007&group_project_id=29689 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-08 10:23:06
|
Task #101435 has been updated. Project: ActiveLock Subproject: ActiveLock 2.0 General Summary: Product Code Generation - once per product Complete: 100% Status: Closed Authority : th2tran Assigned to: th2tran Description: Implement suggestion in: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=985823&group_id=70007&atid=526386 Once a Product Code set has been added to the list, disable the Generate button. Follow-Ups: ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-08-08 10:23 By: th2tran Comment: Closed ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-07-19 12:21 By: th2tran Comment: Done for 2.0.10 ------------------------------------------------------- For more info, visit: http://sourceforge.net/pm/task.php?func=detailtask&project_task_id=101435&group_id=70007&group_project_id=29689 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-08 10:22:35
|
Task #89741 has been updated. Project: ActiveLock Subproject: ActiveLock 2.0 General Summary: Implement TODOs in discussion topic 72 Complete: 100% Status: Closed Authority : th2tran Assigned to: th2tran Description: http://www.activelock.org/boards/index.php?showtopic=72&st=0& Follow-Ups: ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-08-08 10:22 By: th2tran Comment: Closed ------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2004-07-19 12:22 By: th2tran Comment: Done for 2.0.10 ------------------------------------------------------- For more info, visit: http://sourceforge.net/pm/task.php?func=detailtask&project_task_id=89741&group_id=70007&group_project_id=29689 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-06 13:57:03
|
Support Requests item #1004602, was opened at 2004-08-06 13:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by th2tran You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1004602&group_id=70007 Category: None Group: Support Team >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ravi (rvbhatia1) >Assigned to: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Summary: ActiveLock with vb.net Initial Comment: Hi, Ravi here, how to use Activelock with vb.net, any sample implementations ? Thanks in advance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thanh Hai Tran (th2tran) Date: 2004-08-06 13:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797792 Have the look at the tutorial which is included in the latest release (2.0.11). You can also find an online version of it here: http://www.activelock.org/documents/tutorials/BasicTutorial.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1004602&group_id=70007 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-06 13:21:02
|
Support Requests item #1004602, was opened at 2004-08-06 16:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1004602&group_id=70007 Category: None Group: Support Team Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ravi (rvbhatia1) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: ActiveLock with vb.net Initial Comment: Hi, Ravi here, how to use Activelock with vb.net, any sample implementations ? Thanks in advance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=526386&aid=1004602&group_id=70007 |
|
From: Thanh H. T. <th...@sy...> - 2004-07-28 05:53:06
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Email Address Change puts your account back to the Validating queue waiting for the admin's approval. It's been sitting there in the last 4 days. I just approved it. You should have received the validation email by now. If not, at least you should be able to login again. /Thanh Dan Sanders wrote on 27/07/2004 11:17 PM: | I changed my email address on the forum a while ago, but havn't | recieved any emails. I told it to resend, but nothing. I am stuck | now with no ability to post there. (No PMs or anything... grrr... | It really shouldn't lock people out for changing their email | address...) Hopefully one of you nice moderators can help me and | activate the account? Thanks a lot. | | Also... do we know why it's not sending? Should we fix that? | | -Dan (wizzardme2000) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFBBzdvF8rE9X/XrZIRAjJUAKCZB27++7/rghR07WZg3mzeTKxCdQCeIQGj 0tdVxZXukqYDqd4q35pUxZE= =P2Ia -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Dan S. <dan...@sh...> - 2004-07-28 03:16:16
|
I changed my email address on the forum a while ago, but havn't recieved any emails. I told it to resend, but nothing. I am stuck now with no ability to post there. (No PMs or anything... grrr... It really shouldn't lock people out for changing their email address...) Hopefully one of you nice moderators can help me and activate the account? Thanks a lot. Also... do we know why it's not sending? Should we fix that? -Dan (wizzardme2000) |
|
From: Thanh H. T. <th...@us...> - 2004-07-27 06:46:14
|
Update of /cvsroot/activelock/alugen/console In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv25872 Modified Files: alugenc.cpp alugenc.rc Log Message: Fixed bug: RegisteredDate wasn't set 2.0.11 Index: alugenc.cpp =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/activelock/alugen/console/alugenc.cpp,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -d -r1.3 -r1.4 --- alugenc.cpp 19 Jul 2004 12:11:26 -0000 1.3 +++ alugenc.cpp 27 Jul 2004 06:46:04 -0000 1.4 @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ * - products.ini is now expected to reside in the same directory as alugenc.exe. * Previously, it was assumed to be in the working directory. * 07/10/04 th2tran - Fixed bug: upon error, should be returning 1 instead of FALSE + * 07/27/04 th2tran - Forgot to set RegisteredDate for the license. Woops! * ***********************************************************************************************/ @@ -134,6 +135,11 @@ } } + // Registered Date + SYSTEMTIME st; + GetLocalTime(&st); + strRegDate.Format("%04d/%02d/%02d", st.wYear, st.wMonth, st.wDay); + // ActiveLock initialization _Globals* alGlobals; Index: alugenc.rc =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/activelock/alugen/console/alugenc.rc,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -d -r1.3 -r1.4 --- alugenc.rc 19 Jul 2004 12:11:26 -0000 1.3 +++ alugenc.rc 27 Jul 2004 06:46:04 -0000 1.4 @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ VS_VERSION_INFO VERSIONINFO FILEVERSION 1,0,0,2 - PRODUCTVERSION 2,0,0,9 + PRODUCTVERSION 2,0,0,11 FILEFLAGSMASK 0x3fL #ifdef _DEBUG FILEFLAGS 0x1L @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ VALUE "OriginalFilename", "alugenc.exe\0" VALUE "PrivateBuild", "\0" VALUE "ProductName", "ALUGENC\0" - VALUE "ProductVersion", "2, 0, 0, 9\0" + VALUE "ProductVersion", "2, 0, 0, 11\0" VALUE "SpecialBuild", "\0" END END |
|
From: sdmad m <sd...@ho...> - 2004-07-25 15:51:18
|
Hi again Thanh! I do only get the problem after installation of ActiveLock-2.0.10. When producing my own key it works fine. My AL.LIC filecontent for TestApp: [TestApp] ProductVersion=1.0 LicenseType=3 LicenseClass=Single Licensee=Evaluation User MaxCount=1 LicenseKey=AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAACAM7yuQ661hRZ+PQqPsvydL0m2aqu7se6rxw1/565cPpztXn0ACzAzmQ7cLiwBTdLyO2xVcws/jaA14lLU9HqyzCTbcZ1X8EgKpmuxbCs2gKPTNlokB6kLxajdVBUy2g9+rqDd+6oB0NGXR1up7QXqJNwhzZo/pklGgPuhFcu6h/I RegisteredDate=2004/7/23 LastUsed=2004.07.25 15:40:31 Hash1=8daf2aeb3600cf9cca900d87db4a1d6f Expiration=2004/8/22 Mads >From: Thanh Hai Tran <th...@sy...> >Reply-To: act...@li... >To: act...@li... >Subject: Re: [ActiveLock-Development] 2.0 Beta 3 Candidate >Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 16:57:31 -0400 > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Mads, >Can't reproduce the problem. Please send the content of your most >recent al.lic for me to try. >Thanks! > >Thanh Hai Tran wrote on 23/07/2004 10:11 AM: > >| Thanks, Mads. Will check it out. /Thanh >| >| sdmad m wrote on 23/07/2004 5:10 AM: >| >| | After installation of ActiveLock-2.0.10, and when I first run | >| ALTestApp I got this error message: | | <<-2147221499: License >| invalid. You have set your system clock | backward!>> | | Maybe you >| can test it in your locale. | | Mads >| >| >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) > >iD8DBQFBAs06F8rE9X/XrZIRAiV9AJ0SiUGakrPykKzf4hmQJULX5p+TnACeP+KS >O3csCDDmOXXRom6uJmY23Io= >=TxkH >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop >FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! >Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click >_______________________________________________ >Activelock-Development mailing list >Act...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/activelock-development _________________________________________________________________ MSN Hotmail http://www.hotmail.com Med markedets beste SPAM-filter. Gratis! |
|
From: Thanh H. T. <th...@sy...> - 2004-07-24 20:57:39
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mads, Can't reproduce the problem. Please send the content of your most recent al.lic for me to try. Thanks! Thanh Hai Tran wrote on 23/07/2004 10:11 AM: | Thanks, Mads. Will check it out. /Thanh | | sdmad m wrote on 23/07/2004 5:10 AM: | | | After installation of ActiveLock-2.0.10, and when I first run | | ALTestApp I got this error message: | | <<-2147221499: License | invalid. You have set your system clock | backward!>> | | Maybe you | can test it in your locale. | | Mads | | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFBAs06F8rE9X/XrZIRAiV9AJ0SiUGakrPykKzf4hmQJULX5p+TnACeP+KS O3csCDDmOXXRom6uJmY23Io= =TxkH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Dan S. <dan...@sh...> - 2004-07-24 04:08:11
|
I'de be happy to create an ASP version, however PHP is not yet one of my fortes. I think that it would be better to invent a solution to not require licence files for everything, but nothing comes to mind. -Dan P.S. I just had a fun time learning how to re-pesition replies with thunderbird. If this doesn't look right in your email client, it does look right in thunderbird, your email client is weak. >About the only option then is for the user to: >1) Accept that it's going to be weak. >2) Use server-side processing in his website to generate the license file >when the user requests the download. I'm certain this would not be hard >with asp.net. It would be harder with ASP as it would require a custom DLL >on the server and not many shared hosting providers are keen on installing >custom DLLs. Perhaps if we provided the custom DLL with source, many major >hosting providers would be willing to install the DLL. Otherwise, perhaps a >PHP solution could be created. I'm not too familiar with PHP so I don't >know how capable it is. > >-Pete > > >>Therein lies my dilemma. >>Right now the RegisteredDate is set during license generation time and >>is included as part of the license key (i.e. the RSA signature). >>In order to do what you suggested, we'd have to take RegisteredDate >>out of the license key. >>But if we did that, it would weaken the protection because it would >>be possible, then, to hack the RegisteredDate. >>- -T >> >> >> >>>Does any body have any suggestions on how to implement this >>>either inside or outside of AL? The objective is: once the user >>>installs the product, they should immediately be allowed to begin >>>the trial period. I'd like to hear your inputs. >>> >>> >>>Could you set LockType = None, ship the app with a license file and >>>have the installer set the RegisteredDate in the license file? > |
|
From: Thanh H. T. <th...@sy...> - 2004-07-23 14:11:53
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thanks, Mads. Will check it out. /Thanh sdmad m wrote on 23/07/2004 5:10 AM: | After installation of ActiveLock-2.0.10, and when I first run | ALTestApp I got this error message: | | <<-2147221499: License invalid. You have set your system clock | backward!>> | | Maybe you can test it in your locale. | | Mads -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFBARygF8rE9X/XrZIRAl7tAJ9WQdKLTSFgsrFE6XaraLrrsz6h7gCfUW1Z kb25nhsqgbRQxqi5ayXwR7E= =cGBW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
3 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
