Re: [Actionframework-users] using invoke
Status: Inactive
Brought to you by:
ptoman
From: David W. <da...@su...> - 2002-08-09 22:25:49
|
Petr Toman wrote: > Of course, if there is a demand, <output-variable>s could be allowed > also after <invoke>s... your opinions, gentlemen? :) I think the sequential option is more readable than the nested. ie I prefer <template xxx> <invoke xxx/> <output-variable xxx/> </template> instead of <template xxx> <invoke xxx> <output-variable xxx/> </invoke> </template> Actually I think that both should be allowed. David -- David Warnock, Sundayta Ltd. http://www.sundayta.com iDocSys for Document Management. VisibleResults for Fundraising. Development and Hosting of Web Applications and Sites. |