Re: [Actionframework-users] Default items into the Context

[Petr T. <Pet...@pi...>]

>  > We may want to add extra standard items to the context in future
>  > releases, but this risks namespace problems. So instead why don't we
>  > put an ActionFrameworkStandardContext object into the context. At the
>  > moment this would give us to use in our templates
>  >
>  > $ActionFramework.Servlet $ActionFramework.Url $ActionFramework.Action
>  >  $ActionFramework.Version

I've got a question regarding $ActionFramework.Action:

I want to ask everybody's opinion on changing ActionServlet method 
signatures for 0.94 or 0.95, that have arguments 'form' and 'action', to 
'action' only.

Example:

Object afterInvoke(Object retValue, Context context,
                    String form,
                    String action,
                    Object[] convertedParams) throws Exception
would change to:

Object afterInvoke(Object retValue, Context context,
                    String action,
                    Object[] convertedParams) throws Exception

The original methods would become deprecated, but remained functional - 
they would only call the new ones - contactenating 'form' and 'action' 
with dot ('.').

Example:

Object afterInvoke(Object retValue, Context context,
                    String form,
                    String action,
                    Object[] convertedParams) throws Exception {
    return afterInvoke(retValue, context,
                       form + "." + action,
                       convertedParams);
}

-Petr
-- 
 >>> http://dione.zcu.cz/~toman40 - Pet...@pi... - ICQ=22957959 <<<