Re: [Actionframework-users] Default items into the Context

[Petr T. <Pet...@pi...>]

  > We may want to add extra standard items to the context in future
  > releases, but this risks namespace problems. So instead why don't we
  > put an ActionFrameworkStandardContext object into the context. At the
  > moment this would give us to use in our templates
  >
  > $ActionFramework.Servlet $ActionFramework.Url $ActionFramework.Action
  >  $ActionFramework.Version

I agree this is useful!

  > But I can see lots of other good stuff that could go in here, some of
  > it depending on the debug level of ActionFramework so that if
  > debugging it makes extra diagnostics available, giving us a similar
  > feature to phpinfo() which is great when installing/diagnosing php.
  >
  > I don't mind if we use ActionServlet, ActionFramework, AS or AF as
  > the name in the context.

How about $context :)

Personally, I would like to wait with this until ActionClient version
(AS technology used on client side planned for 0.95/0.96), because this
can be done in beforeInvoke() as you have noted.

Of course, we can discuss what else may be put there.

-Petr
-- 
 >>> http://dione.zcu.cz/~toman40 - Pet...@pi... - ICQ=22957959 <<<