Re: [ACPI] Toshiba Satellite P10

[Jaco K. <ja...@kr...>]

Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> 
>>>>>Okay, what *other* patches do you have installed? What kernel are you
>>>>>running? 2.6.15-rc6?
>>>>
>>>>I'm trying with 2.6.14.3, but I've got 2.6.15rc5 available here (can
>>>>always get the VI patch to rc6).  Was intending to run the acpi_include
>>>>patch, but since that is a standard option in 2.6.14.x I never actually
>>>>pulled in that patch, so no other patches and I've backed out suspend2
>>>>now.  Will also give 15rc6 a go in the morning.
>>>
>>>rc5 should be good enough.
>>
>>Same problem.  SysRq+T reveals that the newly spawned process is getting
>>stuck in:
>>
>>ide_do_request+0x18a/0x3c5
>>io_schedule+0xe/0x16
>>sync_page+0x3e/0x4b
>>__wait_on_bit_lock+0x41/0x61
>>sync_page+0x0/0x4b
>>__lock_page+0x9d/0xb1
>>wake_bit_function+0x0/0x55
>>wake_bit_function+0x0/0x55
>>do_generic_mapping_read+0x335/0x7fd
>>__generic_file_aio_read+0x19d/0x203
>>file_read_actor+0x0/0xfa
>>generic_file_read+0xba/0xd8
>>autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x57
>>vfs_read+0x1a5/0x1aa
>>kernel_read+0x50/0x5f
>>prepare_binprm+0xd8/0x103
>>do_execve+0xfe/0x203
>>sys_execve+0x3c/0x6f
>>sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75
>>
>>Second run round the first command I issued worked fine, as did cd to
>>/usr/src/linux, but running make menuconfig failed.  This time the stack
>>trace was considerably longer (I'm not going to type that over).  The
>>top two calls are the same, but it comes in from sync_buffer,
>>__wait_on_bit, sync_buffer, sync_buffer, out_of_line_wait_on_bit,
>>wake_bit_function, wakebit_function, and so forth.  A quick scan of the
>>VI between rc5  and rc6 doesn't reveal any changes that could possibly
>>affect this (I'm going to patch to rc6 in any case).
>>
>>Could it be a bug in reiserfs?  I have run a fsck but no errors were
>>found, so I presume the fs is still in tact.
> 
> Seife is right, this looks like an ide problem. And the fact that
> autorepeat does not work for you may mean something bad with
> interrupts. Can you try "noapic"?

See my other mail.

>>>>Will do if I get it working.  more-or-less is simply not good enough (or
>>>>should I just make a note there?).
>>>
>>>It is good enough for video.txt. It describes how to get _video_
>>>working, and video works just ok for you.
>>
>>You should have received the patch.
> 
> I don't see it here. Can you just attach it to this discussion? It
> should be small enough...

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=9313913&forum_id=6102


-- 
There are only 10 kinds of people in this world,
  those that understand binary and those that don't.
http://www.kroon.co.za/