Re: [ACPI] Toshiba Satellite P10

[Pavel M. <pa...@su...>]

Hi!

> >>>Okay, what *other* patches do you have installed? What kernel are you
> >>>running? 2.6.15-rc6?
> >>
> >>I'm trying with 2.6.14.3, but I've got 2.6.15rc5 available here (can
> >>always get the VI patch to rc6).  Was intending to run the acpi_include
> >>patch, but since that is a standard option in 2.6.14.x I never actually
> >>pulled in that patch, so no other patches and I've backed out suspend2
> >>now.  Will also give 15rc6 a go in the morning.
> > 
> > rc5 should be good enough.
> 
> Same problem.  SysRq+T reveals that the newly spawned process is getting
> stuck in:
> 
> ide_do_request+0x18a/0x3c5
> io_schedule+0xe/0x16
> sync_page+0x3e/0x4b
> __wait_on_bit_lock+0x41/0x61
> sync_page+0x0/0x4b
> __lock_page+0x9d/0xb1
> wake_bit_function+0x0/0x55
> wake_bit_function+0x0/0x55
> do_generic_mapping_read+0x335/0x7fd
> __generic_file_aio_read+0x19d/0x203
> file_read_actor+0x0/0xfa
> generic_file_read+0xba/0xd8
> autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x57
> vfs_read+0x1a5/0x1aa
> kernel_read+0x50/0x5f
> prepare_binprm+0xd8/0x103
> do_execve+0xfe/0x203
> sys_execve+0x3c/0x6f
> sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75
> 
> Second run round the first command I issued worked fine, as did cd to
> /usr/src/linux, but running make menuconfig failed.  This time the stack
> trace was considerably longer (I'm not going to type that over).  The
> top two calls are the same, but it comes in from sync_buffer,
> __wait_on_bit, sync_buffer, sync_buffer, out_of_line_wait_on_bit,
> wake_bit_function, wakebit_function, and so forth.  A quick scan of the
> VI between rc5  and rc6 doesn't reveal any changes that could possibly
> affect this (I'm going to patch to rc6 in any case).
> 
> Could it be a bug in reiserfs?  I have run a fsck but no errors were
> found, so I presume the fs is still in tact.

Seife is right, this looks like an ide problem. And the fact that
autorepeat does not work for you may mean something bad with
interrupts. Can you try "noapic"?

> >>Will do if I get it working.  more-or-less is simply not good enough (or
> >>should I just make a note there?).
> > 
> > It is good enough for video.txt. It describes how to get _video_
> > working, and video works just ok for you.
> 
> You should have received the patch.

I don't see it here. Can you just attach it to this discussion? It
should be small enough...
								Pavel

-- 
Thanks, Sharp!