Re: [ACPI] Toshiba Satellite P10

[Stefan S. <se...@su...>]

On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 10:45:58AM +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> > rc5 should be good enough.
>=20
> Same problem.  SysRq+T reveals that the newly spawned process is gettin=
g
> stuck in:
>=20
> ide_do_request+0x18a/0x3c5
> io_schedule+0xe/0x16
> sync_page+0x3e/0x4b
> __wait_on_bit_lock+0x41/0x61
> sync_page+0x0/0x4b
> __lock_page+0x9d/0xb1
> wake_bit_function+0x0/0x55
> wake_bit_function+0x0/0x55
> do_generic_mapping_read+0x335/0x7fd
> __generic_file_aio_read+0x19d/0x203
> file_read_actor+0x0/0xfa
> generic_file_read+0xba/0xd8
> autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x57
> vfs_read+0x1a5/0x1aa
> kernel_read+0x50/0x5f
> prepare_binprm+0xd8/0x103
> do_execve+0xfe/0x203
> sys_execve+0x3c/0x6f
> sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75

To my untrained eye this looks like an IDE suspend / resume problem.
Maybe another machine that needs those ACPI methods for the IDE drives
badly :-(
--=20
Stefan Seyfried                  \ "I didn't want to write for pay. I
QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices      \ wanted to be paid for what I write."
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, N=FCrnberg \                    -- Leonard Cohe=
n