From: Voluspa <li...@te...> - 2005-12-22 15:08:06
|
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:35:35 +0100 Thomas Renninger wrote: > Voluspa wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:20:15 +0300 Roman I Khimov wrote: > >> | Voluspa: > >>> Nope, neither "nocst" nor "acpi=nocst" gave me back the C1 > >>> functionality... > >> Yep, same here, just tried. > > > > Sorry about the red herring. I've patched 2.6.14 with the two acpi [...] > Maybe it is this little patch that also has been applied in rc5? > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5452 > > If you have ACPI_DEBUG=y compiled in you should have seen: > "BIOS reporting wrong ACPI idfor the processor", then it might be this one. Thanx Thomas, but no, I tripped on a bug totally unrelated to Roman's. Found the culprit and reported + opened a bugzilla: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5767 Mvh Mats Johannesson -- |