From: Yu, L. <lum...@in...> - 2004-03-11 07:37:43
|
>=20 > On Wed, 11 Mar 2004, Len Brown wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 21:26, Nate Lawson wrote: > > > Bob, any word on _OSI implementation? > > > > Bob sent me an initial implementation for review today;-) > > > > I'm uncomfortable, however, at claiming to be compatible=20 > with Windows, > > since I don't really have a definition of exactly what that means... > > > > -Len >=20 > Doesn't matter to me. I plan on claiming to be everything from Win 2k > onward and sort out the rest on the mailing list. :) >=20 > We already fixed some problems by claiming to be Win 2k for _OS. >=20 Cool! what kind of problems? :) --Luming |