Menu
▾
▴
accelutils-devel — Developers discussion
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Carcassi, G. <car...@bn...> - 2012-06-01 20:16:07
|
Hi all! An early reminder that next week we'll be meeting. The main task will be to complete a report similar to last month: https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1U-1MIzb02PhhGcZ7CJ1pg9al-_6C6P5l0xBY9nsLch0 Is there any other topic of general interest that anybody want to discuss? I have one: virtual presentations; maybe I can convince Ralph to tell us about Mercurial queues (which NetBeans 7.2 now in beta supports!). :-) Have a good week-end! Gabriele |
|
From: Ralph L. <Ral...@gm...> - 2012-05-31 14:58:30
|
Dear ChannelFinderFriends,
CF Web Service 1.1.1 has been released.
Changes:
* Fix a resource (i.e. memory) leak that could lead to Glassfish
crashing under certain circumstances. (See CHANNELFINDER-23 in JIRA [1])
* Improve query performance by adding an index to the main value table
in the MySQL database scheme.
* Sort out issues with http vs. http connections, and newer versions
of httplib2 not following redirections for other than GET methods.
Notes:
* For existing databases, there is an update script in the
distribution tar that adds the new index to the database scheme. The
old scheme will still work, but will not have the improved query
performance.
* As RFC2616 [2] explicitly does not allow clients to follow 302
redirects for other methods than GET without user interaction, CF
clients should use the proper URLs for directory queries (both http
and https work) and manipulation (only https works). Relying on
Glassfish redirecting http queries to the appropriate https URL
might not work as expected.
Enjoy!
Ralph
[1] http://java.net/jira/browse/CHANNELFINDER-23
[2] http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html
|
|
From: Carcassi, G. <car...@bn...> - 2012-05-14 14:32:34
|
Ok, seems we are saying, in order of preference: * individual project mailing list * if not, individual users. Will the build for common projects (like the website, or common libraries once we have them) go here? Gabriele From: kunal shroff [mailto:sh...@bn...] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 10:54 AM To: acc...@li... Subject: Re: [Accelutils-devel] Should Jenkins (build) notifications go to this list? Hi, Since we do not have a mailing list of each service I have the emails going to individuals, cause it does not make sense to send them to the acceltuil list.Once we have the mailing lists for channelfinder-developers, olof-developer we can directs the email there. Kunal On 5/11/2012 10:33 AM, Berryman, Eric wrote: Hello! Maybe separate lists for the builds? Eric From: Carcassi, Gabriele [mailto:car...@bn...] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 10:28 AM To: acc...@li...<mailto:acc...@li...> Subject: [Accelutils-devel] Should Jenkins (build) notifications go to this list? Hi all, At this point, many build notifications go to individual mail address. Should we: a) point everything to this list. So that everybody sees the notifications (only when the build breaks), even of other projects, and there is nothing if responsibility changes. b) point to individuals. So that not everybody sees the notifications, but then you have to remember to change them. What do people prefer? Gabriele ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Accelutils-devel mailing list Acc...@li...<mailto:Acc...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/accelutils-devel |
|
From: kunal s. <sh...@bn...> - 2012-05-11 14:54:06
|
Hi, Since we do not have a mailing list of each service I have the emails going to individuals, cause it does not make sense to send them to the acceltuil list.Once we have the mailing lists for channelfinder-developers, olof-developer we can directs the email there. Kunal On 5/11/2012 10:33 AM, Berryman, Eric wrote: > > Hello! > > Maybe separate lists for the builds? > > Eric > > *From:*Carcassi, Gabriele [mailto:car...@bn...] > *Sent:* Friday, May 11, 2012 10:28 AM > *To:* acc...@li... > *Subject:* [Accelutils-devel] Should Jenkins (build) notifications go > to this list? > > Hi all, > > At this point, many build notifications go to individual mail address. > Should we: > > a) point everything to this list. So that everybody sees the > notifications (only when the build breaks), even of other projects, > and there is nothing if responsibility changes. > > b) point to individuals. So that not everybody sees the notifications, > but then you have to remember to change them. > > What do people prefer? > > Gabriele > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Accelutils-devel mailing list > Acc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/accelutils-devel |
|
From: Berryman, E. <ber...@fr...> - 2012-05-11 14:33:18
|
Hello! Maybe separate lists for the builds? Eric From: Carcassi, Gabriele [mailto:car...@bn...] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 10:28 AM To: acc...@li... Subject: [Accelutils-devel] Should Jenkins (build) notifications go to this list? Hi all, At this point, many build notifications go to individual mail address. Should we: a) point everything to this list. So that everybody sees the notifications (only when the build breaks), even of other projects, and there is nothing if responsibility changes. b) point to individuals. So that not everybody sees the notifications, but then you have to remember to change them. What do people prefer? Gabriele |
|
From: Carcassi, G. <car...@bn...> - 2012-05-11 14:28:39
|
Hi all, At this point, many build notifications go to individual mail address. Should we: a) point everything to this list. So that everybody sees the notifications (only when the build breaks), even of other projects, and there is nothing if responsibility changes. b) point to individuals. So that not everybody sees the notifications, but then you have to remember to change them. What do people prefer? Gabriele |
|
From: Shankar, M. <msh...@sl...> - 2012-05-07 17:07:34
|
Wednesdays work for me. Regards, Murali From: Carcassi, Gabriele [mailto:car...@bn...] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 7:07 AM To: Ralph Lange Cc: AccelUtils Developers Subject: [Accelutils-devel] New meeting days Going back to this. It was actually a good thing we were few people at the meeting: we ended up figuring out the mechanics. The way it works is that we write the "what we did/what will do" notes all together, and then people see what the other are writing and ask questions/give comments. This goes actually very fast and no time is wasted on things nobody is interested in discussing. Now, for the day. Thursday is bad for Ralph. How about Wednesdays? Same time. Remember: it's a once a month thing (not every week). Thanks! Gabriele From: Ralph Lange [mailto:Ral...@gm...]<mailto:[mailto:Ral...@gm...]> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 10:13 AM To: Carcassi, Gabriele Cc: AccelUtils Developers Subject: Re: [Accelutils-devel] Meeting this Thursday, May 3rd, 12:00 PST, 15:00 EST, 21:00 CET On 01.05.2012 18:41, Carcassi, Gabriele wrote: Hello again! There was no objection to the day, so we'll have our first meeting this Thursday, May 3rd, 12:00 PST, 15:00 EST, 21:00 CET. I'll setup the hangout and invite everybody. I will not be available this Thursday. Sorry for the delay, but yesterday was a public holiday in Germany. (1st of May, International Workers' Day, is a national holiday in more than 80 countries, says Wikipedia.) We'll go around the table, with everyone saying what they did this month and what they are planning to do for the next. We'll write notes in a way that can be sent to management (Bob and Shen at this point) and to the absentees. It's nicer if you have something cool to show off! Sounds good!! ~Ralph |
|
From: Carcassi, G. <car...@bn...> - 2012-05-07 14:07:39
|
Going back to this. It was actually a good thing we were few people at the meeting: we ended up figuring out the mechanics. The way it works is that we write the "what we did/what will do" notes all together, and then people see what the other are writing and ask questions/give comments. This goes actually very fast and no time is wasted on things nobody is interested in discussing. Now, for the day. Thursday is bad for Ralph. How about Wednesdays? Same time. Remember: it's a once a month thing (not every week). Thanks! Gabriele From: Ralph Lange [mailto:Ral...@gm...] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 10:13 AM To: Carcassi, Gabriele Cc: AccelUtils Developers Subject: Re: [Accelutils-devel] Meeting this Thursday, May 3rd, 12:00 PST, 15:00 EST, 21:00 CET On 01.05.2012 18:41, Carcassi, Gabriele wrote: Hello again! There was no objection to the day, so we'll have our first meeting this Thursday, May 3rd, 12:00 PST, 15:00 EST, 21:00 CET. I'll setup the hangout and invite everybody. I will not be available this Thursday. Sorry for the delay, but yesterday was a public holiday in Germany. (1st of May, International Workers' Day, is a national holiday in more than 80 countries, says Wikipedia.) We'll go around the table, with everyone saying what they did this month and what they are planning to do for the next. We'll write notes in a way that can be sent to management (Bob and Shen at this point) and to the absentees. It's nicer if you have something cool to show off! Sounds good!! ~Ralph |
|
From: Ralph L. <Ral...@gm...> - 2012-05-07 13:43:00
|
Ciao Gabriele, yep, that would be perfect!! Thanks, ~Ralph On 07.05.2012 15:28, Carcassi, Gabriele wrote: > Hi Ralph, > > Ok! Something like: > > Fixed foo. > Fixing foo was really hard because of bar. I tried doing X but it really didn't work because of Y... blah blah blah. > > Will do. > > Gabriele > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralph Lange [mailto:Ral...@gm...] > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 9:01 AM > To: Carcassi, Gabriele > Cc: AccelUtils Developers > Subject: Channelfinder repo > > Hello Gabriele, > > your changeset 208 in the channelfinder repo has a summary line that is more than 230 characters long, and contains detailed information about configuration options for maven-license-plugin. > While this is perfectly legal, it creates an unsightly mess when using command line hg. > > Could we agree on putting only summary information into the summary line of hg commits, and try to keep that first line shorter than 80 chars? > As commit messages can have multiple lines, I would suggest moving details into additional lines. > > What do you think? > ~Ralph > |
|
From: Carcassi, G. <car...@bn...> - 2012-05-07 13:28:58
|
Hi Ralph, Ok! Something like: Fixed foo. Fixing foo was really hard because of bar. I tried doing X but it really didn't work because of Y... blah blah blah. Will do. Gabriele -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Lange [mailto:Ral...@gm...] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 9:01 AM To: Carcassi, Gabriele Cc: AccelUtils Developers Subject: Channelfinder repo Hello Gabriele, your changeset 208 in the channelfinder repo has a summary line that is more than 230 characters long, and contains detailed information about configuration options for maven-license-plugin. While this is perfectly legal, it creates an unsightly mess when using command line hg. Could we agree on putting only summary information into the summary line of hg commits, and try to keep that first line shorter than 80 chars? As commit messages can have multiple lines, I would suggest moving details into additional lines. What do you think? ~Ralph |
|
From: Ralph L. <Ral...@gm...> - 2012-05-07 13:00:51
|
Hello Gabriele, your changeset 208 in the channelfinder repo has a summary line that is more than 230 characters long, and contains detailed information about configuration options for maven-license-plugin. While this is perfectly legal, it creates an unsightly mess when using command line hg. Could we agree on putting only summary information into the summary line of hg commits, and try to keep that first line shorter than 80 chars? As commit messages can have multiple lines, I would suggest moving details into additional lines. What do you think? ~Ralph |
|
From: kunal s. <sh...@bn...> - 2012-05-03 20:57:36
|
Today's meeting is here: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/extras/fee0258bda4eaa59d27f9edeb7c753e760dcaf00?authuser=0&hl=en <https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/extras/fee0258bda4eaa59d27f9edeb7c753e760dcaf00?authuser=0&hl=en> Kunal |
|
From: kunal s. <sh...@bn...> - 2012-05-03 20:09:44
|
Hello, Following are the minutes of the may meeting of the accel util group. https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1U-1MIzb02PhhGcZ7CJ1pg9al-_6C6P5l0xBY9nsLch0 Kunal |
|
From: Ralph L. <Ral...@gm...> - 2012-05-02 14:13:04
|
On 01.05.2012 18:41, Carcassi, Gabriele wrote: > > Hello again! > > > > There was no objection to the day, so we'll have our first meeting > this Thursday, May 3^rd , 12:00 PST, 15:00 EST, 21:00 CET. I'll setup > the hangout and invite everybody. > I will not be available this Thursday. Sorry for the delay, but yesterday was a public holiday in Germany. (1st of May, International Workers' Day, is a national holiday in more than 80 countries, says Wikipedia.) > We'll go around the table, with everyone saying what they did this > month and what they are planning to do for the next. We'll write notes > in a way that can be sent to management (Bob and Shen at this point) > and to the absentees. It's nicer if you have something cool to show off! > Sounds good!! ~Ralph |
|
From: Ralph L. <Ral...@gm...> - 2012-05-02 14:09:40
|
On 30.04.2012 18:41, Carcassi, Gabriele wrote: > Hi all, > > I imagine you are oh so glad to have been subscribed to yet another mailing list! Congratulations! > > As a first topic of discussion: monthly meeting. We should pick a day. I'll propose Thursday. Anybody objects? Yessir. Any recurring appointments I have that are using a fixed weekday, are on Thursdays. I won't be able to participate on 2 Thursdays per month, and it is unlikely that I will be able to arrange late shifts on Thursdays. (As I am blocking Thursdays in my shift preferences because of the recurring appointments.) > As for time, given the time zone constraints, we will have 12:00 for the west coast, 15:00 for the east coast and 21:00 for Europe. Seems to be bad for everybody, so at least is equal. 21:00h should work for me on regular evenings. Thanks a lot, ~Ralph |
|
From: Ralph L. <Ral...@gm...> - 2012-05-01 20:05:11
|
Hi Gabriele, You might want to check for public holidays before assuming no answer means no objection. ;-) I will answer when I'm back at work - tomorrow. Workers of the world - unite! Ralph On Tue May 01 2012 18:41:16 GMT+0200 (CEST), Carcassi, Gabriele <car...@bn...> wrote: > > Hello again! > > > > There was no objection to the day, so we'll have our first meeting > this Thursday, May 3^rd , 12:00 PST, 15:00 EST, 21:00 CET. I'll setup > the hangout and invite everybody. > > > > We'll go around the table, with everyone saying what they did this > month and what they are planning to do for the next. We'll write notes > in a way that can be sent to management (Bob and Shen at this point) > and to the absentees. It's nicer if you have something cool to show off! > > > > Gabriele > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Accelutils-devel mailing list > Acc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/accelutils-devel |
|
From: Carcassi, G. <car...@bn...> - 2012-05-01 16:41:43
|
Hello again! There was no objection to the day, so we'll have our first meeting this Thursday, May 3rd, 12:00 PST, 15:00 EST, 21:00 CET. I'll setup the hangout and invite everybody. We'll go around the table, with everyone saying what they did this month and what they are planning to do for the next. We'll write notes in a way that can be sent to management (Bob and Shen at this point) and to the absentees. It's nicer if you have something cool to show off! Gabriele |
|
From: Carcassi, G. <car...@bn...> - 2012-04-30 16:41:55
|
Hi all, I imagine you are oh so glad to have been subscribed to yet another mailing list! Congratulations! As a first topic of discussion: monthly meeting. We should pick a day. I'll propose Thursday. Anybody objects? As for time, given the time zone constraints, we will have 12:00 for the west coast, 15:00 for the east coast and 21:00 for Europe. Seems to be bad for everybody, so at least is equal. I'll be doing some project stuff today (i.e. clean-up website, attaching licenses/copyright notices, etc...) Gabriele |
