I'm a doctoral student from Huazhong University of Science and Technology in China. The paper 'Levenberg–Marquardt vs Powell’s dogleg method for Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman plasticity model' was wonderful. I had tried my best to test the gtn code based on the website netlib.org/slatec/src/dnls1.f, but I found it always could not converge. when I used the 'powell-lm.f90' code and 'gtn-st-1fet-usr.inp' in abumpack4. the job aborted due to unrecovered error, the log showed 'too many function evaluations'....
I'm a doctoral student from Huazhong University of Science and Technology in China. The paper 'Levenberg–Marquardt vs Powell’s dogleg method for Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman plasticity model' was wonderful. I had tried my best to test the gtn code based on the website netlib.org/slatec/src/dnls1.f, but I found it always could not converge. when I used the 'powell-lm.f90' code and 'gtn-st-1fet-usr.inp' in abumpack4. the job aborted due to unrecovered error, the log showed 'too many function evaluations'....
I'm a doctoral student from Huazhong University of Science and Technology in China. The paper 'Levenberg–Marquardt vs Powell’s dogleg method for Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman plasticity model' was wonderful. I had tried my best to test the gtn code based on the website netlib.org/slatec/src/dnls1.f, but I found it always could not converge. when I used the 'powell-lm.f90' code and 'gtn-st-1fet-usr.inp' in abumpack4. the job aborted due to unrecovered error, the log showed 'too many function evaluations'....
Also, with any problems, please submit a ticket. This helps keep track and not forget or ignore user feedback.
sorry, missed your post I need more detailed info. For starters, try version 4, cd tests/gtn and try job-exp. Let me know of any problems
updated README of release 4
cut release 4
GTN seems working
still GTN is not completely fine
updated job and clean scripts
removed obsolete file
gtn seems to run till the end - need to verify results
some progress on GTN explicit - need to check plast integration - something is wrong
working on gtn VUMAT, not ready, do not use!
updated release readme
cutting release 3.0
updated readme + makefiles
updated GCC aba env file
minor
comments
better comments
better comments
svn Id set
better automation
minor
svn Id set
svn Id set
svn Id set
svn Id set
svn Id set
svn Id set
svn Id set
svn Id set
made all total times and initial time inc the same for all gtn tests
svn Id added
3rd gtn static test passed
svn Id added
svn Id added
svn Id added
svn Id added
removed obsolete file
renaming files for consistency
removed obsolete hard files
progress with gtn tests
starting to validate abq gtn against usr
can run 1fet GTN umat till the end - more testing needed
gtn getting closer
major changes to gtn code
adding svn Id
adding svn Id
adding svn Id
adding svn Id
minor
rousselier tests pass with Intel
minor
getting better
added missing slatec file
minor
moving to tests
minor
renaming gcc makefile for consistency
renaming files, getting the build system up to date
getting back to this after a long while
I have tried to use the GTN VUMAT after many correction I have found that the Props are not passed into the VUMAT correctly. I will appreciate if you could please let me know how to solve the problem.
fixed the full file name for grain size file
release 2.2 was cut wrongly, remove it.
updated
cut release 2.2a
cut release 2.2
forgot to add a file
updated aba env to *not* link against slatec lib
added slatec folder for several reasons:
updated kwan/abum_cafe routine
Added new routines for Wan's work.
updated releases README
cut release 2.1
- use solution from previous iteration if any R...
minor
removed obsolete file
removing obsolete files
removing obsolete files
removing obsolete files
removing obsolete files
removed obsolete files
removed obsolete files