When editing something in the addressbook, and ~/.abook/addressbook is
a symlink, after exiting abook, the symlink is gone, and replaced by a
regular file.
I agree: preserving the symlink would be saner.
But out of curiosity what's the use case?
if ~/.abook is a symlink, there is no issue
if someone wants to use an addressbook in another location, --datafile/-f already do the trick
Thus: why would one make the file ~/.abook/addressbook a symlink without exploring the possibility of datafile selection from by the command line?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I agree: preserving the symlink would be saner.
But out of curiosity what's the use case?
Thus: why would one make the file ~/.abook/addressbook a symlink without exploring the possibility of datafile selection from by the command line?