Re: [Aaron-devel] What language to use for aaron (short and long term)?
Status: Pre-Alpha
Brought to you by:
thetitan
From: Morgan E. <mo...@ta...> - 2001-07-04 01:32:45
|
You seem to think that I'm arguing w/ the quality of Ruby. I'm not. I haven't researched very much, so I don't know. I understand about hacking a language and developing, and a language is just a syntax. But before you develop anything in a new language there is a learning curve. I'm not talking about finding the functions. I'm talking about the subtle nuances to a language, that don't surface until you have developed in it for some time. There are quirks, advantages that you can't seem just get by reading through a language or a spec. You have to develop with the language to understand those nuances. If we are developing something a prototype, then the most effective way would be to develop in something that all of us have developed in. That is the advantage of developing w/ a team like this. I mean, it is going to take us 4 times as long to develop a prototype in Ruby, then it would in PHP. So even if Ruby is better or easier to port to C, the time it takes to learn Ruby costs us. It isn't an effective management decision of the project. I mean the Object Space, sounds like Java's reflection. The marshalling and unmarshalling is like Java, it is exactly what Castor does for Java objects. Why not use Java, at least we have some experience in that? Morgan |