Re: [A-A-P-develop] Yet another patch (dmd.py this time)
Brought to you by:
vimboss
Menu
▾
▴
Re: [A-A-P-develop] Yet another patch (dmd.py this time)
|
From: Lars I. I. <lar...@ig...> - 2004-04-24 13:05:20
|
It seems like this isn't implemented. How and where? Lars Ivar Lars Ivar Igesund wrote: > Bram Moolenaar wrote: > >> Lars - >> >> >>>> For me using $?var when $var was not set is equivalent to use $var when >>>> it is empty. Thus I don't think the precense of a '?' should matter. >>> >>> >>> Reading the docs more thouroughly, I have to agree. >>> >>> So my conclusion on how I want it: >>> >>> During RC-expansion, the result should be nothing if all expanded >>> variables are empty. >> >> >> >> I would agree with you, except that I can think of a situation where you >> don't want it this way: >> >> LIBS = one two >> NOLIBS = >> ext = .lib >> noext = >> >> :print - lib$*LIBS$ext - >> :print - lib$*LIBS$noext - >> :print - lib$*NOLIBS$ext - >> :print - lib$*NOLIBS$noext - >> >> What would you expect to be the result? I would think this: >> >> - libone.lib libtwo.lib - >> - libone libtwo - >> - - >> - - >> >> Agreed? >> >> I think the rule should be that $*var expansion is empty when $var is >> empty. Whether something follows or not is irrelevant. > > > Good example. I agree. > > Lars Ivar Igesund > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > _______________________________________________ > A-A-P-develop mailing list > A-A...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/a-a-p-develop > > |