|
From: Roland C. <rc...@us...> - 2013-04-29 07:41:59
|
Hello developers, In bug 278 Micah Bunting wrote: > I wanted to work more on it, but time was not on my side. My weekend started just after the bug was fixed. Let's agree on a workflow. This is the workflow that Bas Wijnen and I used when both of us were actively working on Pioneers/Gnocatan: When one of us wants to work on a bug/patch/feature, set the 'Owner' field to yourself. That is a signal that the issue is claimed, and that the other developers will not need to look into that issue. If you have ideas, either post to the issue or mail pio-develop. When the patch is ready, it can either be directly committed (after a 'make reindent') or it can be attached to the issue, depending on the expected amount of comments. I think that large/complex patches can best be attached to the issue. When I was very busy developing with Bas Wijnen, we agreed on a three day period. After that period the patch could be committed, before that, is was up for review. (If the review finished earlier, the commit could be done earlier). Bas and I also used the following: - Developer A writes the patch - Developer B writes the ChangeLog (using the name of developer A) and commits. I now think it is better to commit your own patches, it also shows up better with 'svn praise'. :-) Which workflow is chosen depends on personal taste and available time. At this moment I have much time available, but that might change at any time. With kind regards, Roland Clobus |