there have been several requests/bug messages concerning FunctionList Plugin - and rarely any response from developer/development team recently. Also the FunctionList is in alpha state since a year now - quite a long period without update/release for an alpha version.
Therefore my question:
Is FunctionList still under development - or is there no more interest in further enhancements?
I've collected a few issues/bugs ....
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
The leader of this project (I mean Jens Lorenz) is temporarily unreachable.
In the meantime, I even tried to modify his sources in order to fix something, but - alack! - I have problems to compile the sources under VC++ 2005/2008 Express. It's because Jens uses VC++ 2003 which breaks some C++ standards and these incompatibility is significant in VC++ 2005/2008.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
What does this mean? Is it dead (since Jens is not reachable (and this might be forever?))? Or should'nt it be ported to an more recent compiler edition (VC++ 2005/2008) to allow further development by third people?
I think it is dead, unless the port does not take place ...
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I am currently on developing on Hex-Editor because of several issues also here. Especially the Unicode issue. In addition I will release a new version of Explorer to fix also here a resource leak and maybe, both of them come into a feature release of Notepad++.
The FunctionList development hangs at the moment because of several problems. At first my less time for development. Secondly I try to find a solution for the "\n" issue. Therefore I need to implement a different parser concept. If I solved this, I have to rework the view of function. All in all, a lot of work.
Best Regards
Jens
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Hi,
there have been several requests/bug messages concerning FunctionList Plugin - and rarely any response from developer/development team recently. Also the FunctionList is in alpha state since a year now - quite a long period without update/release for an alpha version.
Therefore my question:
Is FunctionList still under development - or is there no more interest in further enhancements?
I've collected a few issues/bugs ....
Good to hear that you are OK and that you still have FunctionList on your focus ....
The leader of this project (I mean Jens Lorenz) is temporarily unreachable.
In the meantime, I even tried to modify his sources in order to fix something, but - alack! - I have problems to compile the sources under VC++ 2005/2008 Express. It's because Jens uses VC++ 2003 which breaks some C++ standards and these incompatibility is significant in VC++ 2005/2008.
What does this mean? Is it dead (since Jens is not reachable (and this might be forever?))? Or should'nt it be ported to an more recent compiler edition (VC++ 2005/2008) to allow further development by third people?
I think it is dead, unless the port does not take place ...
It is alive and I am reachable again!
I am currently on developing on Hex-Editor because of several issues also here. Especially the Unicode issue. In addition I will release a new version of Explorer to fix also here a resource leak and maybe, both of them come into a feature release of Notepad++.
The FunctionList development hangs at the moment because of several problems. At first my less time for development. Secondly I try to find a solution for the "\n" issue. Therefore I need to implement a different parser concept. If I solved this, I have to rework the view of function. All in all, a lot of work.
Best Regards
Jens
> It is alive and I am reachable again!
Great news! :)
> I try to find a solution for the "\n" issue
What is this issue? Do you mean declarations in a form of
int
somefunction
(
int param1,
int param2
)
{
return param1 + param2;
}
?