If anyone has an unstructured Fortran 95/2003 language definition file they would like to share I would greatly appreciate it. No one seems to ever support Fortran and when they do the have all their stuff geared towards the older standards (66,77 etc.). people don't seem to realize that Fortran is still extensively used for scientific computations (because thats what its designed for) and that people like to use the newer language features when possible. I would definitely like to see 90/95 at least syntax highlighting included in the next N++ release.
Thanks
Zaak
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I've posted the F90/F95 file several times, but I don't have it with me on this machine. However, if you search these fora on "Fortran", I'm sure it will show up.
Regards.
Greg
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
If anyone has an unstructured Fortran 95/2003 language definition file they would like to share I would greatly appreciate it. No one seems to ever support Fortran and when they do the have all their stuff geared towards the older standards (66,77 etc.). people don't seem to realize that Fortran is still extensively used for scientific computations (because thats what its designed for) and that people like to use the newer language features when possible. I would definitely like to see 90/95 at least syntax highlighting included in the next N++ release.
Thanks
Zaak
I've posted the F90/F95 file several times, but I don't have it with me on this machine. However, if you search these fora on "Fortran", I'm sure it will show up.
Regards.
Greg
OK, start working on it,then.