Menu

NO to the MS Office format as an ISO standard

Don HO
2007-10-14
2012-11-13
  • Don HO

    Don HO - 2007-10-14

    Generally, I'm not an evangelist of anti-Microsoft, but I don't think it's reasonable that OOXML (Office OpenXML) is imposed as ISO standard by Microsoft since there is already a standard ISO26300 named Open Document Format (ODF).

    For those ones don't know about the context, OOXML is a xml format made by Microsoft to specify the document such as spreadsheets, charts presentation, word processing etc...
    OOXML has become a standard of Ecma (European Computer Manufacturers Association) in December 2006. Now Microsoft tries to make OOXML as ISO standard (instead of using the existing standard ODF). A final decision will be made in February 2008 by ISO.

    I encourage those who have the same idea to sign a petition here :

    http://www.noooxml.org/petition

    Don

     
    • Don HO

      Don HO - 2008-01-26

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7h3LpCQAGzs&eurl=http://www.noooxml.org/start

      Don't let Microsoft decide for you.
      Sign the petition!

      Don

       
    • Nobody/Anonymous

      Nice vid.

       
      • LMS_RampagE

        LMS_RampagE - 2008-02-01

        I've already signed the petition. I think that Microsoft want another piece from the cake and i do not want that. There is an ODF as ISO standard and i'm cool with this... I say NO to the OOXML!

         
    • Anonymous

      Anonymous - 2008-02-04

      Already signed some time ago, and have kept and will keep asking others to do so!

       
    • Frigo

      Frigo - 2007-10-14

      http://www.sg.hu/kep/2007_08/0830open1.jpg

      [img]http://www.sg.hu/kep/2007_08/0830open1.jpg[/img]

       
    • young

      young - 2007-10-14

      signed ;-)

       
    • Nobody/Anonymous

      Signed

       
    • Bob Helling

      Bob Helling - 2007-10-16

      Signed (will have to confirm from my home email later)  :)

       
    • Nobody/Anonymous

      What's wrong with another ISO standard?

       
    • CodeNexus

      CodeNexus - 2007-10-16

      Nothing wrong with a good standard.... if it is good.  From what I have read there are quite a few problems with this one.

      Surely if there is other standards out there already that cover the same ground why need a new one?  Why doesn't Microsoft and co just engage in the current standards instead of trying to invent an un-needed one?

      If you are going to make a standard surely it should...
      A) Work.
      B) Be needed.

       
    • Nobody/Anonymous

      Signed!

       
    • Nobody/Anonymous

      I don't like a standard by Sun and IBM, so I won't be signing no petitions. There should be two standards and let the best one win.