Search Results for "idea"

...You can use either IPP code (or a subset of functions that do not require IPP) on the CPU side, or use NPP/CUDA on the GPU side, or use both together. The function syntax is similar to that found in MatLab and the library is designed to make it easy to port your code from MatLab to C++. The idea is to provide Scientists, Engineers, Researchers and other non full-time programmers an easy to use, high performance library of functions.

...To infer the structure of community-level metabolic interactions, BiomeNet applies a mixed-membership modelling framework to enzyme abundance information. The basic idea is that the mixture components of the model (metabolic reactions, subnetworks, and networks) are shared across all groups (microbiome samples), but the mixture proportions vary from group to group. Through this framework, the model can capture nested structures within the data. BiomeNet is unique in modeling each metagenome sample as a mixture of complex metabolic systems (metabosystems).

Using a sequence of Open Source CAD/CAM and graphics tools, integrated through Excel macro code, "Lego Charts" extends the idea of the Excel 3-D bar chart. It allows the placement, shapes and colours of the bars to represent further dimensions to the data. The chart is presented as a photo-realistic model apparently constructed out of LEGO® [1] bricks. The downloaded package consists of an Excel template to create the charts, an extensive installation and user guide, and two fully-worked samples. ...

Statastizard(c)2012 Nick Emblow is a program designed to guide its user into the right statistical test, perform the test, and report the results in a meaningful way. The idea of this is that the user won't actually need to know that they are using a mann-whitney U over a t-test, for example - it just tests for normality and homoscedastic of variance, and decides which test to use, then reports the results. Why? Because time after time, people come to me with some test that they've done that they think "proves" something - when in reality they've either not done a comparative test to start with (ex. a correlation), failed to test for confounding factors (such as normality etc) and as a result, failed to appropriately identify even the right test to do.