Search Results for "risk"

...It operates with a zero-knowledge architecture: all encryption and decryption happen in the browser, and only encrypted blobs are transmitted to and stored on the server, reducing the risk of leaks or unauthorized access. Users can generate shareable links with optional expiration times, view limits, and password protection to tailor how and when secrets are consumed, and links automatically expire or self-destruct after use to prevent reuse or exposure. The platform supports easy deployment via Docker or hosted options, making it practical for individuals, teams, or enterprises that want to safeguard secrets without relying on third-party storage.

...A typical use of this library is when you are using DynamoDBMapper, where transparent protection of all objects serialized through the mapper can be enabled via configuring an AttributeEncryptor. Use SaveBehavior.PUT or SaveBehavior.CLOBBER with AttributeEncryptor. If you do not do so you risk corrupting your signatures and encrypted data. When PUT or CLOBBER is not specified, fields that are present in the record may not be passed down to the encryptor, which results in fields being left out of the record signature. This in turn can result in records failing to decrypt. For more advanced use cases where tighter control over the encryption and signing process is necessary, the low-level DynamoDBEncryptor can be used directly.

...I updated this, with a different hash than original, since I found a potential collision on some blocks, not but specific to that challenge. To further correct this, I modified the padding when it's less than the block size. I hold no guarantee of the security of this algorithm, USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. I have had no 3rd party analysis done on the algorithm to date, but research is welcome, and a challenge is even provided in CHALLENGE.txt.